KIDNEY STONES – WHEN TO USE MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY AND WHEN TO USE ULTRA-MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY?: A NARRATIVE REVIEW
Abstract
Background: Miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy techniques have been developed to reduce the morbidity associated with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) while maintaining high stone clearance. Among these approaches, mini-PCNL and ultra-mini PCNL (UMP) are increasingly used; however, their optimal indications remain incompletely defined.
Aims: To review and synthesize current evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and clinical indications of mini-PCNL and UMP in the management of kidney stone disease.
Methods: A narrative review of the literature was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, and international guideline documents addressing mini-PCNL and UMP were included. Evidence was synthesized descriptively with emphasis on stone- and patient-related factors influencing technique selection.
Results: Both mini-PCNL and UMP demonstrated high stone-free rates when applied in appropriately selected patients. Mini-PCNL achieved superior stone clearance for larger (15–30 mm), multiple, or high-density renal stones, owing to efficient fragment extraction. UMP was associated with lower perioperative morbidity, reduced bleeding risk, and shorter hospital stay, with optimal outcomes observed in smaller stone burdens. Differences in efficacy between techniques were minimal for stones <15 mm but became more pronounced with increasing stone size and complexity.
Conclusions: Mini-PCNL and UMP are complementary techniques in contemporary percutaneous stone surgery. Mini-PCNL is best suited for larger or more complex stones requiring active fragment removal, whereas UMP offers advantages in minimizing invasiveness and accelerating recovery in selected patients. Individualized treatment selection based on stone characteristics, patient factors, and surgical expertise is essential to optimize outcomes.
References
Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. (2012). Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 62(1):160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. (2017). Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 35(9):1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6
Lieske JC, Rule AD, Krambeck AE, et al. (2014). Stone composition as a function of age and sex. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 9(12):p 2141-2146. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05660614
Geraghty RM, Proietti S, Traxer O, Archer M. (2017). Worldwide impact of warmer seasons on the incidence of renal colic and Kidney stone disease: evidence from a systematic review of literature. Journal of Endourology. 31(8):729–735. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0123
Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ, et al. (2009). Kidney Stones and the risk for chronić kidney disease. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 4(4):804–811. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.05811108
Fernström I, Johansson B. (1976). Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 10(3):257–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. (2016). EAU Guidelines on diagnosis and conservative management of urolithiasis. 69(3):468-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/jeururo.2015.07.040
Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. (2007). Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 51(4):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020
Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, et al. (1998). The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Word J Urol. 16(6):371–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450050083
Desai MR, Solanki R. (2013). Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium. BJU Int. 112(7):1046–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12193
Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, et al. (2016). Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. 117(4):655–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13242
Karakan T, Kilinc MF, Bagcioglu M, et al. (2017). Comparison of ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and micro-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in moderate-size renal stones. Arch.Esp. Urol. 70(5):550–555. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28613207/
Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. (2016). Surgical management of stones: AUA guideline. J Urol. 196(4):1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
Ferrari R. (2015). Writing narrative style literaturę reviews. Med Writing. 24(4):230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
Grant MJ, Booth A. (2009). A typology of reviews. Health Info Libr J. 26(2):91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Greenhalgh T, Thorne S, Malterud K. (2018). Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews. Eur J Clin Invest. 48(6):e12931. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
Zeng G, Zhu W, Liu Y, et al. (2023). Miniaturized PCNL in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What is new? Asian J Urol. (10):275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2023.01.003
Rassweiler JJ, Renner C, Eisenberger F. (2000). The management of complex renal stones. BJU Int. 86(8):919–28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00906.x
Cormio A, Auciello M, Falagario UG, et al. (2024). Mini and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients. Results from a single-surgeon large series. Eur Urol Open Science. 63:113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2024.03.011
Knoll T, Buchholz N, Wendt-Nordahl G. (2012). Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower-pole stones. Arab J Urol. 10(3):336–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.06.004
Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. (2004). Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 18(8):715–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2004.18.715
Gao SX, Liao HB, Chen TY, et al. (2017). Different tract sizes of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourolrol. 31(11):1101–1110. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0547
Nischith D, Saptarshi P. (2016). Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi in paediatric patients: A review of twenty cases. Urol Ann. 8(1):16–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.163794
Mariappan P, Smith G, Bariol VS, et al. (2005). Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. J Urol. 173(5):1610–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154350.78826.96
Bellman CG, Davidoff R, Candela J, et al. (1997). Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol. 157(5):1578–82. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9112480/
Kronenberg P, Traxer O. (2015). Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. World J Urol. 33(4):463–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1395-1
Enikeev D, Hermann TRW, Taratkin M, et al. (2023). Thulium fiber laser in endourology: current clinical evidence. Curr Opin Urol. 33(2):95–107. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001057
Pauchard F, Ventimiglla E, Corrales M, Traxer O. (2022). A practical Guide for Intra-Renal Temperature and Pressure Management during Rirs: What is the Evidence Telling Us J. Clin Med. 11(12):3429. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123429
Sabler IM, Katafigiotis J, Gofrit ON, Duvdevani M. (2018). Present indications and techniques of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: What the future holds? Asian J Urol. 6;5(4):287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.004
Worcester ME, Coe LF. (2010). Clinical practice: calcium kidney stones. N Engl J Med. 363(10):954–963. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1001011
Copyright (c) 2026 Anhelina Loputs, Anastasiia Holoborodko, Ewa Wieczorkiewicz, Eliza Garbacz, Agnieszka Pocheć, Bartosz Lautenbach, Dariusz Nędza, Klaudia Wojciech, Patrycja Stępińska, Wiktoria Błaszczyk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
