3D PRINTED BIOMATERIALS IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW
Abstract
This review provides a comprehensive and methodologically structured analysis of advancements in additive manufacturing (AM) and bioprinting for dental and maxillofacial reconstruction between 2017 and 2025. AM has become an essential component of personalised medicine, enabling the fabrication of patient‑specific implants, functional scaffolds, and biologically active constructs that enhance surgical precision and regenerative outcomes. The rapid development of titanium lattice frameworks, bioactive ceramics, biodegradable polymers, and hybrid multimaterial systems has significantly improved the biomechanical and biological performance of craniofacial reconstructions. Concurrently, innovations in bioprinting—including next‑generation bioinks, cell‑laden hydrogels, microvascularisation strategies, and tissue‑specific regeneration—have expanded the potential for restoring dental pulp, periodontal ligament, alveolar bone, and soft tissues using biologically integrated constructs. This review synthesises data from 164 peer‑reviewed publications, outlining key technological progress, material innovations, in vitro and in vivo biological responses, translational findings, and clinical outcomes. Despite substantial progress, challenges persist, including vascularisation of large constructs, long‑term immunomodulatory behaviour, standardisation of evaluation protocols, and regulatory integration into clinical practice. Future directions highlight the growing impact of AI‑assisted design, automated point‑of‑care manufacturing, and 4D dynamic biomaterials capable of functional adaptation. Overall, AM and bioprinting are positioned to become central technologies shaping the next generation of personalised maxillofacial reconstruction.
References
Ebrahim AMS, Fahem MM. The future of 3D printing in medicine. Open Dentistry Journal. 2023;17:217–226.
Mohd N, Razali M, Ghazali MJ, Kasim NH. Current Advances of Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Application in Dentistry: A Scoping Review. Materials. 2022;15(18):6398. doi:10.3390/ma15186398
Li Z, Wang Q, Liu G. A Review of 3D Printed Bone Implants. Micromachines. 2022;13(4):528. doi:10.3390/mi13040528
Salah M, Tayebi L, Moharamzadeh K, Naini FB. Three-dimensional bio-printing and bone tissue engineering: technical innovations and potential applications in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2020;42:18. doi:10.1186/s40902-020-00263-6
Review: custom-made 3D-printed bioresorbable scaffolds for maxillofacial bone reconstruction (scoping review 2024).
Review of 3D printing of bones and cartilage: Evidence and practice. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine. 2024;16:100180. doi:10.1016/j.stlm.2024.100180
In-depth review: 3D printing technology in dentistry—materials, techniques, clinical applications. Polymers. 2025;17(7):886.
Yang J, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Porous titanium scaffolds for maxillofacial reconstruction: fabrication and biological performance. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2021;109:1264–1277.
Zhao F, Li D, Chen S, et al. 3D printed calcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration in craniofacial defects. Materials Science & Engineering C. 2020;112:110917.
Wang L, Feng P, Hu Y, et al. Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for dental bone tissue engineering: a review. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2019;107:1289–1302.
Kuss M, Li Z, Zhang W. Bioprinting in dentistry: stem cell-based strategies for pulp and periodontal regeneration. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2022;11:2102058.
Silva A, Oliveira H, Rodrigues MT, et al. Vascularized bioprinted dental pulp constructs for endodontic regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2023;29:45–60.
Chen Y, Liu X, Zhao W, et al. Periodontal ligament regeneration using 3D printed scaffolds with PDL cells. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:1430–1442.
ISO/ASTM 52900:2021. Additive manufacturing — general principles — terminology.
Patel M, Singh R, Arora P. Economic and regulatory considerations for clinical adoption of 3D printed implants. J Dent Res. 2022;101:1283–1294.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices. FDA Guidance Document. 2021.
Ghayor C, Weber FE. Bioactive surface modifications for titanium implants. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;107:110299.
Tahmasebi H, et al. Accuracy of 3D-printed surgical guides in implantology: systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33:605–619.
Giannoni A, et al. Patient-specific titanium implants in maxillofacial surgery: review of clinical outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32:e621–e629.
Rasperini G, et al. 3D printed scaffolds for alveolar ridge augmentation: clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40:123–130.
Gao B, et al. Bioprinting strategies for vascularized tissue constructs. Biomaterials. 2019;198:204–220.
Cui X, Boland T, D'Lima D, et al. Thermal and mechanical properties of cell-laden hydrogels for bioprinting. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2018;24:177–187.
Taniguchi N, et al. Effect of pore size and porosity on osteoconductivity of titanium scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31:82.
Zhao L, et al. Surface modifications of titanium for enhanced osteointegration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;100:703–715.
Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphates in bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2017;10:106.
Lanza R, et al. Stem cell strategies for dental pulp regeneration. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9:445–456.
Malda J, et al. 4D bioprinting for regenerative dentistry: future perspectives. Adv Mater. 2021;33:e2005831.
Wang H, et al. Application of 3D printed surgical guides in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79:109–119.
Ventura P, et al. Custom prosthetic rehabilitation using 3D printing technology. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020;44:219–229.
Mota C, et al. Advances in 4D printing for craniofacial tissue engineering. Mater Today Bio. 2023;18:100507.
Copyright (c) 2025 Anita Pakuła, Anna Baranowska, Aleksandra Oparcik, Kinga Szyszka, Anastazja Orłowa, Kamil Turlej, Laura Kurczoba, Marta Cieślak, Klaudia Martyna Patrzykąt, Julia Pawłowska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.

