PRECISION MEDICINE IN BREAST RECONSTRUCTION: CLINICAL ADVANCES, REHABILITATION AND PATIENT EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer represents the most frequently diagnosed malignancy among women globally, affecting approximately 2.12 million new cases annually according to the Global Burden of Disease 2021 analysis. While radical mastectomy remains the primary surgical treatment, it often results in significant chest wall defects and axillary distortion with profound negative impacts on body image, psychological well-being, and overall quality of life (QoL). Breast reconstruction has evolved into an integral component of modern oncological treatment, extending beyond aesthetic considerations to encompass comprehensive patient-reported outcomes and functional recovery. Contemporary healthcare increasingly embraces precision medicine principles, wherein breast reconstruction serves as a paradigmatic field requiring personalized treatment algorithms that balance oncological safety, aesthetic outcomes, and patient-specific variables. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence on precision medicine approaches in breast reconstruction, examining surgical innovations, postoperative rehabilitation strategies, and patient-centered outcome assessment.
Materials and Methods: This review constitutes a thorough analysis of peer-reviewed literature obtained from the PubMed scientific database, synthesizing materials spanning from the Introduction through References of the manuscript. The analysis encompasses recent advances in surgical techniques, rehabilitation protocols, bioengineered technologies, and patient-reported outcome measures employed in breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
Key Findings: Contemporary breast reconstruction integrates three interdependent pillars: advanced surgical techniques, targeted postoperative rehabilitation, and precise patient-centered outcome assessment via validated tools such as BREAST-Q. Modern surgical strategies include nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate reconstruction, prepectoral breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrices (ADM), and autologous free flap techniques (particularly DIEP flaps). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols significantly reduce hospitalization duration to post-operative day 3 with equivalent complication rates compared to traditional protocols. Early mobilization and structured physical therapy demonstrably improve shoulder range of motion and functional outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes consistently demonstrate that autologous reconstruction produces superior satisfaction and health-related quality of life compared to implant-based approaches. Emerging tissue engineering technologies, including three-dimensional bioprinting, adipose-derived stem cells, and bioengineered scaffolds, represent promising future directions for functional breast reconstruction with reduced morbidity.
Conclusions: Precision medicine in breast reconstruction requires integrated decision-making incorporating molecular data, clinical variables, and subjective patient experiences throughout all treatment phases. Optimal outcomes depend upon personalized surgical strategy selection, early and targeted rehabilitation, and standardized measurement of patient-reported outcomes. This multifaceted, precision-based approach ensures maximal functional and psychological benefits while minimizing procedural morbidity, ultimately delivering comprehensive quality of life improvements for breast cancer survivors.
References
Deng, T., Zi, H., Guo, X. P., Luo, L. S., Yang, Y. L., Hou, J. X., Zhou, R., Yuan, Q. Q., Liu, Q., Huang, Q., & Wu, G. S. (2025). Global, Regional, and National Burden of Breast Cancer, 1990-2021, and Projections to 2050: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Thoracic cancer, 16(9), e70052. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70052
Wang, X., Zhu, K., Ren, L., Li, H., Lin, S., Qing, X., & Wang, J. (2020). Quality of life and related risk factors after breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Gland surgery, 9(3), 767–774. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-532
Chu, C. K., Roubaud, M. S., & Butler, C. E. (2021). An introduction to "New Frontiers in Breast Reconstruction". Gland surgery, 10(1), 395–397. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2020-nfbr-13
Cho, M. J., Schroeder, M., Flores Garcia, J., Royfman, A., & Moreira, A. (2025). The Current State of the Art in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Modern/Future Approaches. Journal of clinical medicine, 14(5), 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051543
Tampaki, E. C., & Tampakis, A. (2021). Breast Reconstruction: Necessity for Further Standardization of the Current Surgical Techniques Attempting to Facilitate Scientific Evaluation and Select Tailored Individualized Procedures Optimizing Patient Satisfaction. Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 16(6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518745
Seth, I., Lim, B., Lu, P. Y. J., Xie, Y., Cuomo, R., Ng, S. K., Rozen, W. M., & Sofiadellis, F. (2024). Digital Twins Use in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Journal of clinical medicine, 13(24), 7861. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13247861
Malekpour, M., Malekpour, F., & Wang, H. T. (2023). Breast reconstruction: Review of current autologous and implant-based techniques and long-term oncologic outcome. World journal of clinical cases, 11(10), 2201–2212. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i10.2201
Manrique, O. J., & Escandón, J. M. (2023). Breast reconstruction in the era of evidence-based medicine. Annals of translational medicine, 11(10), 341. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2022-79
Katsuragi, R., Ozturk, C. N., Chida, K., Mann, G. K., Roy, A. M., Hakamada, K., Takabe, K., & Satake, T. (2024). Updates on Breast Reconstruction: Surgical Techniques, Challenges, and Future Directions. World journal of oncology, 15(6), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1935
Shiraishi, M., Sowa, Y., Tsuge, I., Kodama, T., Inafuku, N., & Morimoto, N. (2022). Long-Term Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life Following Breast Reconstruction Using the BREAST-Q: A Prospective Cohort Study. Frontiers in oncology, 12, 815498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.815498
Agha, R. A., Al Omran, Y., Wellstead, G., Sagoo, H., Barai, I., Rajmohan, S., Borrelli, M. R., Vella-Baldacchino, M., Orgill, D. P., & Rusby, J. E. (2018). Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing versus skin-sparing mastectomy. BJS open, 3(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50119
Tousimis, E., & Haslinger, M. (2018). Overview of indications for nipple sparing mastectomy. Gland surgery, 7(3), 288–300. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2017.11.11
Zenn M. R. (2018). Evaluation of skin viability in nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM). Gland surgery, 7(3), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.04.04
Rathat, G., Chaumette, M., Fontaine, V., Rebel, L., Pissarra, J., Duflos, C., & Duraes, M. (2025). Endoscopic prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: First French survey of 10 patients. Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 54(1), 102862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2024.102862
Kuhlefelt, C., Repo, J. P., Jahkola, T., Kauhanen, S., & Homsy, P. (2024). Immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Long-term follow-up on health-related quality of life and satisfaction with breasts. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS, 88, 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.11.028
Tsantakis, V., Dimitroulis, D. A., Kontzoglou, K. C., & Nikiteas, N. I. (2024). Investigating the Difference in Quality of Life Between Immediate and Delayed Breast Cancer Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Cancer diagnosis & prognosis, 4(3), 223–230. https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10312
Xu, Q., Wan, Y., Sun, Z., Tan, X., & Zong, X. (2025). Immediate breast reconstruction on overall and breast cancer-specific survival: A propensity score matched analysis. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 80, 104422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2025.104422
Alves, A. S., Tan, V., Scampa, M., Kalbermatten, D. F., & Oranges, C. M. (2022). Complications of Immediate versus Delayed DIEP Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Cancers, 14(17), 4272. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174272
Amro, C., Sorenson, T. J., Boyd, C. J., Hemal, K., Vernice, N. A., Park, J. J., Cohen, O. D., Choi, M., & Karp, N. S. (2024). The Evolution of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Innovations, Trends, and Future Directions. Journal of clinical medicine, 13(23), 7407. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237407
Gravina, P. R., Pettit, R. W., Davis, M. J., Winocour, S. J., & Selber, J. C. (2019). Evidence for the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Seminars in plastic surgery, 33(4), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696986
Glynou, S. P., Sousi, S., Cook, H., Zargaran, A., Zargaran, D., & Mosahebi, A. (2024). A comparison of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) efficacy and complication profile in women undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC cancer, 24(1), 1598. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13359-3
Petrie, K., Cox, C. T., Becker, B. C., & MacKay, B. J. (2022). Clinical applications of acellular dermal matrices: A review. Scars, burns & healing, 8, 20595131211038313. https://doi.org/10.1177/20595131211038313
Taj, S., Chandavarkar, R., & Vidya, R. (2024). Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 60(3), 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60030431
Nelson, J. A., Lee, I. T., & Disa, J. J. (2018). The Functional Impact of Breast Reconstruction: An Overview and Update. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 6(3), e1640. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001640
Alabaster, K., Homsy, C., Puyana, S., Higgins, M., Ferrin, P., Mulcahey, M. K., & Chaffin, A. (2021). Exercise after Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Evaluating Current Trends and Practices of U.S. Plastic Surgeons. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 9(10), e3857. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003857
Xu, Q., Liu, C., Jia, S., Wang, P., Liu, Q., Ding, F., Ren, Y., Ma, X., & Zhu, J. (2024). Effect of physical exercise on postoperative shoulder mobility and upper limb function in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland surgery, 13(8), 1494–1510. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-255
Kim, K. H., Yeo, S. M., Cheong, I. Y., Kim, Y., Jeon, B. J., & Hwang, J. H. (2019). Early Rehabilitation after Total Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction with Tissue Expander Insertion in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Case-control Study. Journal of breast cancer, 22(3), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e40
Mazuquin, B., Sunemi, M. M. O., E Silva, M. P. P., Sarian, L. O. Z., Williamson, E., & Bruce, J. (2021). Current physical therapy care of patients undergoing breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Brazil. Brazilian journal of physical therapy, 25(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2020.05.010
Astanehe, A., Temple-Oberle, C., Nielsen, M., de Haas, W., Lindsay, R., Matthews, J., McKenzie, D. C., Yeung, J., & Schrag, C. (2018). An Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Microvascular Breast Reconstruction Is Safe and Effective. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 6(1), e1634. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001634
Clark, R. C., Alving-Trinh, A., Becker, M., Leach, G. A., Gosman, A., & Reid, C. M. (2023). Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction. Annals of translational medicine, 11(12), 414. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-23-1509
Leonardis, J. M., Lyons, D. A., Kidwell, K. M., Giladi, A. M., Lipps, D. B., & Momoh, A. O. (2021). The Influence of Functional Shoulder Biomechanics as a Mediator of Patient-Reported Outcomes following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 147(1), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007486
Arora, N., Patel, R., Sohi, G., Merchant, S., & Martou, G. (2023). A Scoping Review of the Application of BREAST-Q in Surgical Research. JPRAS open, 37, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.04.005
Liu, L. Q., Branford, O. A., & Mehigan, S. (2018). BREAST-Q Measurement of the Patient Perspective in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 6(8), e1904. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001904
Klassen, A. F., Dominici, L., Fuzesi, S., Cano, S. J., Atisha, D., Locklear, T., Gregorowitsch, M. L., Tsangaris, E., Morrow, M., King, T., & Pusic, A. L. (2020). Development and Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module. Annals of surgical oncology, 27(7), 2238–2247. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08195-w
Seth, I., Seth, N., Bulloch, G., Rozen, W. M., & Hunter-Smith, D. J. (2021). Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 13, 711–724. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S256393
Young-Afat, D. A., Gibbons, C., Klassen, A. F., Vickers, A. J., Cano, S. J., & Pusic, A. L. (2019). Introducing BREAST-Q Computerized Adaptive Testing: Short and Individualized Patient-Reported Outcome Assessment following Reconstructive Breast Surgery. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 143(3), 679–684. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005314
Berkane, Y., Oubari, H., van Dieren, L., Charlès, L., Lupon, E., McCarthy, M., Cetrulo, C. L., Jr, Bertheuil, N., Uygun, B. E., Smadja, D. M., & Lellouch, A. G. (2024). Tissue engineering strategies for breast reconstruction: a literature review of current advances and future directions. Annals of translational medicine, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-23-1724
Wu, M., Chen, L., Qi, Y., Ci, H., Mou, S., Yang, J., Yuan, Q., Yao, W., Wang, Z., & Sun, J. (2022). Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell promotes angiogenesis via integrin β1/ERK1/2/HIF-1α/VEGF-A signaling pathway for off-the-shelf breast tissue engineering. Stem cell research & therapy, 13(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-022-02770-x
Basara, G., Ludwiszewski, D., Uzel, S., Reynolds, D., Chou, Z., Graveline, A., Bardales, S., Hernandez-Alvarez, A., Lee, D., Foster, L., Chen, C., Lewis, J., Lin, S. J., & Perry, L. (2025). SO12. ReConstruct Bio: Redefining Breast Reconstruction With Bioengineered Living Tissues. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 13(Suppl 2), 34-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0001114120.42259.2b
Mayer, H. F., Coloccini, A., & Viñas, J. F. (2024). Three-Dimensional Printing in Breast Reconstruction: Current and Promising Applications. Journal of clinical medicine, 13(11), 3278. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113278
Fang, J., Chen, F., Liu, D., Gu, F., & Wang, Y. (2021). Adipose tissue-derived stem cells in breast reconstruction: a brief review on biology and translation. Stem cell research & therapy, 12(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-01955-6
Jordao, A., Cléret, D., Dhayer, M., Le Rest, M., Cao, S., Rech, A., Azaroual, N., Drucbert, A. S., Maboudou, P., Dekiouk, S., Germain, N., Payen, J., Guerreschi, P., & Marchetti, P. (2023). Engineering 3D-Printed Bioresorbable Scaffold to Improve Non-Vascularized Fat Grafting: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Biomedicines, 11(12), 3337. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11123337
Ma, X., Yue, Q., Fu, S., Liu, C., & Luan, J. (2024). Decellularized adipose-derived matrix from Superficial layers of abdominal adipose tissue exhibits superior capacity of adipogenesis compared to deep layers. Materials today. Bio, 28, 101235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101235
Aryanpour, Z., McCranie, A. S., Yu, J. W., Winocour, J., Egan, K. G., Mathes, D., & Kaoutzanis, C. (2025). A Scoping Review of Precision Medicine in Breast Reconstruction (2011-2025). Journal of personalized medicine, 15(5), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15050178
Copyright (c) 2025 Michalina Chodór, Maciej Kokoszka, Aleksandra Tomaszewska, Kinga Karczewska, Sonia Mojzyk, Aleksandra Mierniczek, Aleksandra Ćwirko-Godycka, Nikola Murawska, Natalia Dymel, Ryszard Feret
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
