THE HISTORICAL TRACES OF ANCIENT SUMERIAN LANGUAGE IN DIALECT LEXIS OF AZERBAIJAN AND TURKISH LANGUAGE
National affiliation of ancient Sumerian language is one of problematic problems create serious conflict in the world linguistics. These are the serious fact putan end to conflicts modern Turkic languages ancient Sumerian and dialect of the comparative investigation. The historical dialectological facts is shows being specific place all-Turkish languages and dialects between the dialects of Nakhchivan and Eastern Anatoly. The efficient situation in the dialects modern Nakhchivan and Eastren Anatolyan dialects is one of defining basic factors of the ancient Sumerian language Orhon inscriptions, eposes of the "Kitabi Dede Korkut", in the İbn Muhenna dictionary, in the "Oğuzname", in the work "Divany lugat-it Türk", of the Turkish folk-lore, the century XIX of the literary works and modern Turk dialects classic until words developed is one of defining basic factors position the between all-Turkish dialect and dialects of the Nakhchivan and Eastren Anadolyan dialects. The comparison Sumerian language of the Nakhchivan and Eastern Anatolyan dialects is being affirms of the dictionaries prepared on the basis of the ancient Turkish language.
The phonetic, lexical facts be reflected of the ancient Sumerian language in the works Sturtevantin "A Hittite Glossory ve Suppelment to a Hittite Glossary" and the work “The historical connection of the Sumer and Turkic languages by about age of the Turkish” Osman Nedim Tunaʼs, “The Sumerian language is decisively the Turkish” and the work A.Caliloğluʼs to work according to with elucidating passed up to this day and the comparison Nakhcivan and Anatolyan dialects affirms being the most ancient language of the Turkish. Many words in the ancient Sumerian language involves for the attention by the same phonetic composition and semantic meaning adjoining by dialects of Nakhchivan and Anatoly dialects by words in the language of the other ancient Turk monuments: yağı, yu, kul, yığın, yig, çağa, çak, köğüs, gid, fani, yogun, qalın, tügün, bağlam, çin, doğru, eke, üz, kəsmək, süz, tuş, öl, teηri, taη, neη, isig, azuk, sürüg, asgu, kapkacak, kaç, kuru, neme, korı, toku, togıra, dengüş, zevzek, dingilde, cengel, qaqa//qağa, gim, kalıη, ku, öbür and other. The interesting side like is involves for the attention in Sumerian language for instance, kıdık//kidik qidiyh koduk, kuzu, köşək, küçük of the animal names develop in the Nakhchivan and Anatoly dialects.
Amanjolov A.S. History of Ancient Turkic Script, Almaty, 2003.
Thomas Walter Manson/ A companion to the Bible/ T&T/Clark, 1950.
Y.B.Yusifov. History of ancient East. Baku State University Publishing House,1993.
Ekrem Akkurgal. The Hattian and Hittite civilizations. Ministry of Culture, 2001.
İ.M.Dyakonov. Languages of ancient Front Asia. Moscow,1967.
Atakichi Jeliloghlu Kasim, “Sumerian is definitely a Turkic language. Istanbul, 2001
Ahmet Buran, Sherife Oghrash. Elazıx Ağızları. Elazıgh, 2003.
Dialects and accents of Nakhchivan AR. Baku, 1962.
Osman Nedim Tuna. The age of Turkish language in historical relationship of Sumerian and Turkic languages, Ankara, 1990
İ.T.Kaneva. Sumerian language. Sankt-Peterburg, 1996.
Jalilov F. Morphonlogy of Azerbaijan language. Baku, 1988.
Imamguliyeva K. Sharur accents of Azerbaijan language. Dissertation for candidacy. Baku, 1991. 13. Muazzez İlmiye Çıgh. Storm in Sumerians, Turks in Storm. Source publications 2008.
Copyright (c) 2019 The author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.