DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND SOMATIC MANIFESTATION OF ENDOMETRIOSIS: AN UPDATED REVIEW
Abstract
Endometriosis is a chronic gynecological condition affecting millions of women worldwide. It involves the growth of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, which leads to significant symptoms and a marked decline in quality of life.
The aim of the Study: The purpose of this work is to present the most recent knowledge on the diagnosis, treatment methods, and somatic symptoms of endometriosis. The analysis covers publications from 2020 to 2025 and focuses on evaluating current medical approaches as well as identifying areas that require further development to improve prognosis and the daily functioning of patients.
Materials and Methods: A structured search of publications from 2020–2025 was conducted in the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using keywords related to diagnostic methods, therapeutic options, and the somatic and psychosomatic symptoms of endometriosis.
Results: Our review highlights that while invasive laparoscopy remains the diagnostic gold standard for endometriosis, advanced imaging techniques like transvaginal ultrasound and MRI are increasingly crucial, particularly for deep infiltrative disease. Despite these tools, significant diagnostic delays persist due to non-specific symptoms and the lack of sensitive non-invasive biomarkers. Current treatments involve hormonal therapies and surgical removal of lesions, but these approaches face challenges such as side effects, recurrence risks, and complications. Crucially, endometriosis is recognized as a multisystem disorder with diverse somatic manifestations including gastrointestinal, urinary, and systemic symptoms like chronic fatigue, alongside significant mental health impacts and increased risks for conditions such as cardiovascular disease and certain cancers
Conclusions: The collected data indicate that endometriosis is a multisystem disorder, and its effective management requires collaboration among specialists from various fields. Such an approach enables better tailoring of therapy and improved symptom control. A major challenge remains the long diagnostic delay, which still ranges from several to more than ten years. Advances in modern imaging techniques and the development of sensitive biomarkers may substantially shorten this period and allow earlier intervention.
References
A. S. Laganà, A. Vitagliano, V. Chiàntera, and E. Cicinelli, “Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis and Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: Novel Approaches to an Old Problem,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 13, p. 3914, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/jcm11133914.
P. Rosendo‐Chalma et al., “Endometriosis: Challenges in Clinical Molecular Diagnostics and Treatment,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 26, no. 9. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 3979, Apr. 23, 2025. doi: 10.3390/ijms26093979.
A. W. Horne and S. A. Missmer, “Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis,” BMJ. Nov. 14, 2022. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070750.
C. V. Anastasiu et al., “Biomarkers for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Endometriosis: State of the Art and Future Perspectives,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, no. 5. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 1750, Mar. 04, 2020. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051750.
M. Takeuchi, K. Matsuzaki, and M. Harada, “Endometriosis, a common but enigmatic disease with many faces: current concept of pathophysiology, and diagnostic strategy,” Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 42, no. 8. Springer Science+Business Media, p. 801, Apr. 25, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01569-5.
G. Kaspute, E. Bareikiene, U. Prentice, I. Uzielienè, D. Ramašauskaitė, and T. Ivaškienė, “A Comprehensive Review of Advanced Diagnostic Techniques for Endometriosis: New Approaches to Improving Women’s Well-Being,” Medicina, vol. 60, no. 11. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 1866, Nov. 14, 2024. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111866.
L.-H. Chen, W.-C. Lo, H.-Y. Huang, and H. Wu, “A Lifelong Impact on Endometriosis: Pathophysiology and Pharmacological Treatment,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 24, no. 8. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 7503, Apr. 19, 2023. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087503.
F. A. Ferrari et al., “Robotic surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis: is it time to take a step forward?,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 11, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1387036.
F. Ribeiro and H. Ferreira, “Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 22. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 6844, Nov. 14, 2024. doi: 10.3390/jcm13226844.
P. T. K. Saunders and A. W. Horne, “Endometriosis: new insights and opportunities for relief of symptoms,” Biology of Reproduction, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf164.
L. C. Giudice, A. W. Horne, and S. A. Missmer, “Time for global health policy and research leaders to prioritize endometriosis,” Nature Communications, vol. 14, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43913-9.
B. Herranz‐Blanco, E. Daoud, P. Viganò, J. A. García-Velasco, and E. Colli, “Development and Validation of an Endometriosis Diagnostic Method Based on Serum Biomarkers and Clinical Variables,” Biomolecules, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1052, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/biom13071052.
H. Mariadas, J.-H. Chen, and K.-H. Chen, “The Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Endometriosis: From Basic Pathophysiology to Clinical Implications,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 26, no. 6. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 2458, Mar. 10, 2025. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062458.
M. Salmon, J. Sibéoni, A. Harf, M. R. Moro, and M. Ludot-Grégoire, “Systematic review on somatization in a transcultural context among teenagers and young adults: Focus on the nosography blur,” Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 13. Frontiers Media, p. 897002, Jul. 25, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.897002.
W. Rief and A. Martin, “How to Use the New DSM-5 Somatic Symptom Disorder Diagnosis in Research and Practice: A Critical Evaluation and a Proposal for Modifications,” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, vol. 10, no. 1. Annual Reviews, p. 339, Jan. 04, 2014. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153745.
F. Cuffaro, E. Russo, and A. Amedei, “Endometriosis, Pain, and Related Psychological Disorders: Unveiling the Interplay among the Microbiome, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress as a Common Thread,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 12, p. 6473, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25126473.
M. J. Griffiths, A. W. Horne, D. A. Gibson, N. Roberts, and P. T. K. Saunders, “Endometriosis: recent advances that could accelerate diagnosis and improve care,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 30, no. 9. Elsevier BV, p. 875, Jul. 10, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2024.06.008.
M. Sadłocha, J. Toczek, K. Major, J. Staniczek, and R. Stojko, “Endometriosis: Molecular Pathophysiology and Recent Treatment Strategies—Comprehensive Literature Review,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 17, no. 7. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 827, Jun. 24, 2024. doi: 10.3390/ph17070827.
M. A. Ochoa-Bernal and A. T. Fazleabas, “The Known, the Unknown and the Future of the Pathophysiology of Endometriosis,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 11, p. 5815, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/ijms25115815.
K. Upson, “Environmental Risk Factors for Endometriosis: a Critical Evaluation of Studies and Recommendations from the Epidemiologic Perspective,” Current Epidemiology Reports, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 149, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40471-020-00236-3.
A. Tong, A. G. Cope, T. L. Waters, J. S. McDonald, and W. M. VanBuren, “Best Practices: Ultrasound Versus MRI in the Assessment of Pelvic Endometriosis,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 223, no. 6, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.2214/ajr.24.31085.
A. Daniilidis, G. Grigoriadis, D. Dalakoura, M. N. D’Alterio, S. Angioni, and H. Roman, “Transvaginal Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Endometriosis—An Overview: How, Why, and When,” Diagnostics, vol. 12, no. 12. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 2912, Nov. 23, 2022. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122912.
G. Gedefaw et al., “Proteomics approach to discovering non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers and understanding the pathogenesis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 22, no. 1. BioMed Central, p. 685, Jul. 26, 2024. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05474-3.
A. I. G. Bauşic et al., “Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis,” Diagnostics, vol. 12, no. 7. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 1767, Jul. 21, 2022. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071767.
S. Guerriero et al., “Advances in Imaging for Assessing Pelvic Endometriosis,” Diagnostics, vol. 12, no. 12. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 2960, Nov. 26, 2022. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122960.
S. M. El-Maadawy, N. Alaaeldin, and C. B. Nagy, “Role of preoperative ultrasound mapping in the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective observational study,” The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 1, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s43055-021-00526-w.
S. W. Young et al., “Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis,” Radiology, vol. 311, no. 1. Radiological Society of North America, Apr. 01, 2024. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232191.
J. Avery et al., “Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 2: a systematic review of recent developments in magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine and computed tomography,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 121, no. 2. Elsevier BV, p. 189, Dec. 16, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.017.
S. Harth, F. Roller, F. Zeppernick, I. Meinhold‐Heerlein, and G. A. Krombach, “Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Respect to Morphological Criteria,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 1794, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101794.
X. Zhang, T. He, and W. T. Shen, “Comparison of physical examination, ultrasound techniques and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A systematic review and meta analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. Spandidos Publishing, Jul. 24, 2020. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9043.
I. Thomassin‐Naggara et al., “ESUR consensus MRI for endometriosis: indications, reporting, and classifications,” European Radiology, vol. 35, no. 11, p. 7260, May 2025, doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11579-0.
P. D. Corte, M. Klinghardt, S. von Stockum, and K. Heinemann, “Time to Diagnose Endometriosis: Current Status, Challenges and Regional Characteristics—A Systematic Literature Review,” BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. Wiley, Oct. 07, 2024. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17973.
H. Grundström, H. Kilander, P. Wikman, and M. Olovsson, “Demographic and clinical characteristics determining patient-centeredness in endometriosis care,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 307, no. 4, p. 1047, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06887-5.
“Shining a light on endometriosis: time to listen and take action,” BMC Medicine, vol. 21, no. 1, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02820-y.
K. Nirgianakis, K. Egger, D. R. Kalaitzopoulos, S. Lanz, L. Bally, and M. D. Mueller, “Effectiveness of Dietary Interventions in the Treatment of Endometriosis: a Systematic Review,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 29, no. 1. Springer Nature, p. 26, Mar. 24, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00418-w.
E. A. Kalopedis, A. Zorgani, Д. А. Зиновкин, M. Barri, C. D. Wood, and M. Z. I. Pranjol, “Leveraging the role of the microbiome in endometriosis: novel non-invasive and therapeutic approaches,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 16. Frontiers Media, Sep. 16, 2025. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1631522.
M. Garvey, “Endometriosis: Future Biological Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 25, no. 22. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 12242, Nov. 14, 2024. doi: 10.3390/ijms252212242.
Л. М. Михалева et al., “Malignant Transformation and Associated Biomarkers of Ovarian Endometriosis: A Narrative Review,” Advances in Therapy, vol. 37, no. 6. Adis, Springer Healthcare, p. 2580, May 08, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01363-5.
M. Pavone et al., “Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence,” Journal of Robotic Surgery, vol. 18, no. 1. Springer Science+Business Media, May 16, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2.
S. Legendri, M. Carbonnel, A. Féki, G. Moawad, G. Aubry, and A. Vallée, “Improvement of Post-Operative Quality of Life in Patients 2 Years after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Pain and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 11, no. 20, p. 6132, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/jcm11206132.
B. Chen, L. Zhao, R. Yang, and T. Xu, “New insights about endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: pathogenesis, risk factors, prediction and diagnosis and treatment,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 14, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1329133.
S. J. Holdsworth‐Carson, C. Ng, and U. P. Dior, “Editorial: Comorbidities in Women With Endometriosis: Risks and Implications,” Frontiers in Reproductive Health, vol. 4, p. 875277, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/frph.2022.875277.
T. Tulandi and P. Vercellini, “Growing evidence that endometriosis is a systemic disease,” Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 49, no. 3. Elsevier BV, p. 104292, May 24, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104292.
Ż. Kimber-Trojnar, A. Pilszyk, M. Niebrzydowska, Z. Pilszyk, M. Ruszała, and B. Leszczyńska‐Gorzelak, “The Potential of Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Patients with Endometriosis,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 13. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, p. 2762, Jun. 23, 2021. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132762.
Copyright (c) 2026 Agnieszka Bugała, Aleksandra Markuszewska, Julia Wendt, Adam Andrzejewski, Dominika Raether, Olga Wcisłek, Urszula Chmielecka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
