THE EXPANDING ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: IMPACTS ON CLINICAL QUALITY, PATIENT OUTCOMES, AND THE FUTURE OF PHYSICIAN EMPLOYMENT – A REVIEW

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Medical Diagnosis, Clinical Quality, Treatment Decision Support, Patient Outcomes, Physician Workforce

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming medical diagnosis and treatment, presenting significant opportunities to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline clinical workflows, and enable more personalized, data-driven patient care. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on the expanding applications of AI in diagnostic interpretation, therapeutic decision-making, and clinical management, while also examining its broader implications for healthcare quality, patient outcomes, and the future of physician employment. A structured review methodology was applied, incorporating 54 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 across key medical domains, including radiology, oncology, chronic disease management, predictive analytics, and healthcare workforce transformation. The reviewed literature demonstrates that AI-based systems can equal or exceed clinician performance in selected, well-defined diagnostic tasks, contributing to earlier disease detection, improved risk stratification, and more optimized treatment planning. At the same time, the translation of these technologies into routine clinical practice remains constrained by persistent challenges, including algorithmic bias, limited transparency and explainability, regulatory uncertainty, data privacy concerns, and variability in real-world performance. Beyond clinical outcomes, the growing automation of cognitive tasks traditionally performed by physicians raises important questions regarding professional deskilling, evolving role boundaries, and the reconfiguration of medical labor. While AI is unlikely to fully replace clinicians, its continued integration is expected to substantially reshape clinical responsibilities, interdisciplinary collaboration, and required skill sets. Overall, this review underscores the dual impact of AI as both a driver of improved clinical quality and a catalyst for structural change within the medical profession, and identifies key research and policy priorities necessary to ensure its safe, ethical, and equitable implementation.

References

Topol, E. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7

Ali, O., Ehsan, S., Khan, S., & Rafiq, M. (2023). A systematic literature review of artificial intelligence in the healthcare sector. Heliyon, 9(4), e15112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15112

Kocabas, M., & Arslan, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis in clinical practice: A review of accuracy, safety, and ethical considerations. Diagnostics, 14(3), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030455

Takita, H., Kabata, D., Walston, S. L., Tatekawa, H., Saito, K., Tsujimoto, Y., … Ueda, D. (2025). Diagnostic performance comparison between generative AI and physicians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digital Medicine, 8, 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01543-z

Fahim, Y. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: Clinical applications and future direction. Journal of Health Informatics, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02456-7

World Health Organization. (2023). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200

Nagendran, M., Chen, Y., Lovejoy, C. A., Gordon, A. C., Komorowski, M., Harvey, H., … Maruthappu, M. (2020). Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: Systematic review of design, reporting, and validation. BMJ, 368, m689. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m689

Shen, J., Zhang, C., Xiao, X., & Li, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in treatment decision support: A review of clinical applications and challenges. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1356129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1356129

Milenkovic, A. (2025). Healthcare AI for physician-centered decision-making. Computers, 14(8), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14080320

Faiyazuddin, M. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on healthcare: Enhancing clinical skills and opening new roles for professionals. Health Science Reports, 8(2), e70312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70312

Kelly, C. J., Karthikesalingam, A., Suleyman, M., Corrado, G., & King, D. (2019). Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Medicine, 17, 195. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1426-2

Zhang, Z., Yang, J., & Xu, L. (2023). Trust in artificial intelligence in medical diagnosis: A systematic review of patient and clinician perspectives. BMC Medical Ethics, 24, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00904-6

Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L., & Beam, A. L. (2021). The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(11), e745–e750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00208-9

Heinrichs, H. (2025). Physicians’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence in medicine: A survey of clinical trust and technology acceptance. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e74187. https://doi.org/10.2196/74187

Lyell, D., Coiera, E., & Magrabi, F. (2018). Automation bias and verification complexity: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(4), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx025

Natali, C., Marconi, L., Dias Duran, L. D., & Cabitza, F. (2025). AI-induced deskilling in medicine: A mixed-method review and research agenda for healthcare and beyond. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58, 11352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11352-1

World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report: Healthcare and artificial intelligence. World Economic Forum.

Baklola, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in disease diagnostics: A narrative review exploring the role of AI in healthcare. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 104, 105066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2025.105066

Paneerselvam, G. S., Lua, P. L., Chooi, W. H., Rehman, I. U., Goh, K. W., & Ming, L. C. (2025). Effectiveness of mobile apps in improving medication adherence among chronic kidney disease patients: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e53144. https://doi.org/10.2196/53144

Brawańska, H. (2025). AI in medicine: An analysis of threats, risks and solutions for the future of healthcare. Annales of Medicine Science, 47(2), 102–119.

Bussone, A., Stumpf, S., & O’Sullivan, D. (2015). The role of explanations on trust and reliance in clinical decision support systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics.

Tonekaboni, S., Joshi, S., McCradden, M. D., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). What clinicians want: Contextualizing explainable machine learning for clinical end use. In Proceedings of the Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference.

Views:

32

Downloads:

9

Published
2026-02-18
Citations
How to Cite
Mikołaj Grodzki, Maciej Zachara, Mateusz Bartoszek, Patryk Harnicki, Erwin Grzegorzak, Rafał Pelczar, Jakub Minas, Paulina Dybiak, Adrian Morawiec, Paweł Słoma, & Oliwia Krawczyk. (2026). THE EXPANDING ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT: IMPACTS ON CLINICAL QUALITY, PATIENT OUTCOMES, AND THE FUTURE OF PHYSICIAN EMPLOYMENT – A REVIEW. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 1(1(49). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.1(49).2026.4721

Most read articles by the same author(s)