LIGHT QUALITY EVALUATION IN DRAWING WORKSHOPS THROUGH NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING’S COMBINATION: CASE STUDY, BLOCK 06 WORKSHOPS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TÉBESSA
Abstract
Daylight is a crucial element in architectural design. The evaluation of daylighting in buildings serves two main objectives. The first is to achieve visual comfort through daylighting, which is most suitable for human physiology. The second objective is to examine energy efficiency and control energy consumption. Daylighting strategies can significantly reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing the lighting and electrical cooling needs of buildings (Jean-Louis Scartezzini, 1993). Appropriate architectural design not only provides access to inspiring visual outdoor information but also contributes significantly to sustainable development by replacing and displacing electrical energy consumption in buildings (Suzel BALEZ 2007). Our study investigates the performance level of the combination of both natural and artificial lighting in design workshops, using both comparative and experimental approaches. The importance of the study aims at reducing energy consumption and energy costs by utilizing natural lighting when possible. Therefore, the overall objective of this research is to improve the quality of light in the indoor space by combining natural and artificial lighting to create a more uniform and balanced lighting. Additionally, this research aims to create a more pleasant indoor environment for occupants through the use of natural light, which can contribute to their well-being and health.
References
A. belakehal (1), K. TABET AOUL(2).daylighting in buildings. reference to arid environments with a hot and dry climate.
Boyce, P. R., Hunter, C. M., & Howlett, O. (2003). The benefits of daylight through windows. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
Capeluto, I. G., & Shaviv, E. (2009). The benefits of the use of advanced glazing and shading systems in dwellings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(10), 2384-2390.
Lam, K. P., Chan, W. T., & Fong, N. K. (2009). A review of daylighting strategies in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(10), 2384-2390.
Reinhart, C. F., & Wienold, J. (2013). The daylighting dashboard–A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces. Building and Environment, 61, 44-62.
Balez, S. (2007). Lighting quality and energy efficiency: A study of the design integration of natural and artificial lighting. Lighting Research and Technology, 39(2), 141-158.
Mardaljevic, J., & Nabil, A. (2007). Daylighting metrics for residential buildings. Solar Energy, 81(2), 194-207.
Millet, M.S. et al, (1980). GDDM: Including clear sky conditions. Proc. Of 5th Nat. Pas. Sol. Conf, Boulder Co, ASES, pp.1183-1191.
Reinhart, C. F., & Walkenhorst, O. (2001). Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds. Energy and Buildings, 33(7), 683-697.
Scartezzini, J. L. (1993). Architectural integration of solar energy technologies–the state of the art. Solar Energy, 50(1), 19-30.
The union of lighting: France "L'éclairage et le confort visuel". Paris. p1 [On line] www.syndicatéclairage.com (pdf document consulted on 20 May 2004).
Led by Fair Oaks Energy (a consulting firm for The State Board for Energy Efficiency and Pacific Gas and Electric Co.).
Business Unit Building and Systems, The Netherlands W.E. Hathaway (1992); A study into the effects of types of light on children.
Views:
118
Downloads:
58
Copyright (c) 2024 Belarbi Lakhdar, Ahriz Atef, Benmicia Nawal, Boudersa Ghani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
