STROKE: PATHOGENESIS, TRADITIONAL AND MODERN NEUROREHABILITATION STRATEGIES – A REVIEW OF CURRENT METHODS

Keywords: Stroke, Neurorehabilitation, Neuroplasticity, Robotic-Assisted Therapy, Virtual Reality, Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

Abstract

Objectives: Stroke remains one of the leading causes of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. The objective of this review was to synthesize current evidence on the biological mechanisms underlying ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and to evaluate the effectiveness of traditional and emerging neurorehabilitation strategies.

Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using major medical databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Additional sources were identified through manual reference screening. Studies examining pathophysiology and rehabilitation approaches in stroke were included and qualitatively analyzed.

Results: Findings indicate that acute energy failure, excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation are key pathophysiological drivers of early neuronal damage, while phases of neuroplastic reorganization strongly influence recovery potential. Traditional rehabilitation approaches remain central due to strong evidence supporting their effectiveness in motor relearning, however, limitations related to therapy intensity and patient engagement persist. Emerging modalities—such as robotic-assisted training, virtual reality–based interventions, telerehabilitation, non-invasive brain stimulation, and vagus nerve stimulation—show increasing evidence for enhancing training dosage, modulating cortical excitability, and enabling individualized therapy.

Conclusions: Integrating conventional rehabilitation with modern technological and neuromodulatory interventions appears to offer the most effective strategy for optimizing functional outcomes and supporting sustainable long-term recovery in stroke survivors.

References

Feigin, V. L., Forouzanfar, M. H., Krishnamurthi, R., Mensah, G. A., Connor, M., Bennett, D. A., Moran, A. E., Sacco, R. L., Anderson, L., Truelsen, T., O'Donnell, M., Venketasubramanian, N., Barker-Collo, S., Lawes, C. M., Wang, W., Shinohara, Y., Witt, E., Ezzati, M., Naghavi, M., Murray, C., … Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2010 (GBD 2010) and the GBD Stroke Experts Group (2014). Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet (London, England), 383(9913), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4

Aho, K., Harmsen, P., Hatano, S., Marquardsen, J., Smirnov, V. E., & Strasser, T. (1980). Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 58(1), 113–130.

Akinwuntan, A. E., Devos, H., Verheyden, G., Baten, G., Kiekens, C., Feys, H., & De Weerdt, W. (2010). Retraining moderately impaired stroke survivors in driving-related visual attention skills. Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 17(5), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1705-328

Akinwuntan, A. E., Wachtel, J., & Rosen, P. N. (2012). Driving simulation for evaluation and rehabilitation of driving after stroke. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association, 21(6), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.12.001

He, Y. L., Gao, Y., & Fan, B. Y. (2019). Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with rehabilitation training for treatment of post-stroke limb spasticity. Medicine, 98(39), e17261. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017261

Veerbeek, J. M., Langbroek-Amersfoort, A. C., van Wegen, E. E., Meskers, C. G., & Kwakkel, G. (2017). Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 31(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316666957

Richards, C. L., Malouin, F., Lamontagne, A., McFadyen, B. J., Dumas, F., Comeau, F., Robitaille, N. M., & Fung, J. (2018). Gait Training after Stroke on a Self-Paced Treadmill with and without Virtual Environment Scenarios: A Proof-of-Principle Study. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 70(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2016-97

Błażejewska-Hyżorek, B., et al. (2019). Postępowanie w udarze mózgu: Wytyczne postępowania. Polski Przegląd Neurologiczny,

Tollár, J., Kóra, S., Széphelyi, K., Drotár, I., Prukner, P., Törő, B., Prontvai, N., Csutorás, B., Haidegger, T., & Hortobágyi, T. (2025). Effects of walking training with and without a robot and standard care on clinical and mobility outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in acute ischemic stroke patients. Experimental gerontology, 210, 112882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2025.112882

Campbell, B. C. V., & Khatri, P. (2020). Stroke. Lancet (London, England), 396(10244), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31179-X

Velayati, F., Ayatollahi, H., & Hemmat, M. (2020). A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Interventions for Therapeutic Purposes in the Elderly. Methods of information in medicine, 59(2-03), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1713398

Coupar, F., Pollock, A., Rowe, P., Weir, C., & Langhorne, P. (2012). Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical rehabilitation, 26(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511420305

Ponsford, A.-S., Viitanen, M., Lundberg, C., & Johansson, K. (2008). Assessment of driving after strokea pluridisciplinary task. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(2), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2007.07.015

Dirnagl, U., Iadecola, C., & Moskowitz, M. A. (1999). Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends in neurosciences, 22(9), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01401-0

Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2014). Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. The Lancet. Neurology, 13(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70264-3

Dawson, J., Liu, C. Y., Francisco, G. E., Cramer, S. C., Wolf, S. L., Dixit, A., Alexander, J., Ali, R., Brown, B. L., Feng, W., DeMark, L., Hochberg, L. R., Kautz, S. A., Majid, A., O'Dell, M. W., Pierce, D., Prudente, C. N., Redgrave, J., Turner, D. L., Engineer, N. D., … Kimberley, T. J. (2021). Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet (London, England), 397(10284), 1545–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X

Kopalli, S. R., Shukla, M., Jayaprakash, B., Kundlas, M., Srivastava, A., Jagtap, J., Gulati, M., Chigurupati, S., Ibrahim, E., Khandige, P. S., Garcia, D. S., Koppula, S., & Gasmi, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in stroke rehabilitation: From acute care to long-term recovery. Neuroscience, 572, 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.03.017

Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011). Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet (London, England), 377(9778), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5

Laver, K. E., Lange, B., George, S., Deutsch, J. E., Saposnik, G., & Crotty, M. (2017). Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 11(11), CD008349. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4

Lefaucheur, J. P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Di Lazzaro, V., Filipović, S. R., Grefkes, C., Hasan, A., Hummel, F. C., Jääskeläinen, S. K., Langguth, B., Leocani, L., Londero, A., Nardone, R., Nguyen, J. P., Nyffeler, T., Oliveira-Maia, A. J., Oliviero, A., Padberg, F., … Ziemann, U. (2020). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clinical neurophysiology: official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 131(2), 474–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002

Murphy, T. H., & Corbett, D. (2009). Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 10(12), 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2735

NFZ. (2024). Statystyki zachorowań na udar mózgu w Polsce. Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia.

Pollock, A., Baer, G., Campbell, P., Choo, P. L., Forster, A., Morris, J., Pomeroy, V. M., & Langhorne, P. (2014). Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014(4), CD001920. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3

Ciortea, V. M., Motoașcă, I., Ungur, R. A., Borda, I. M., Ciubean, A. D., & Irsay, L. (2021). Telerehabilitation—A viable option for the recovery of post-stroke patients. Applied Sciences, 11(21), 10116. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110116

Saposnik, G., Levin, M., & Outcome Research Canada (SORCan) Working Group (2011). Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians. Stroke, 42(5), 1380–1386. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605451

Faralli, A., Bigoni, M., Mauro, A., Rossi, F., & Carulli, D. (2013). Noninvasive strategies to promote functional recovery after stroke. Neural plasticity, 2013, 854597. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/854597

Quattrocelli, S., Russo, E. F., Gatta, M. T., Filoni, S., Pellegrino, R., Cangelmi, L., Cardone, D., Merla, A., & Perpetuini, D. (2024). Integrating Machine Learning with Robotic Rehabilitation May Support Prediction of Recovery of the Upper Limb Motor Function in Stroke Survivors. Brain sciences, 14(8), 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14080759

Straudi, S., Ahmed, I., Vallin, E., Borsato, S., Bozzolan, M., Da Roit, M., Lazzarini, S. G., & Arienti, C. (2025). The Effectiveness of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques Combined With Motor Interventions in Adult Patients After Stroke: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Neuromodulation: journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 28(7), 1104–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurom.2025.05.004

Veldema, J., & Gharabaghi, A. (2022). Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 19(1), 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y

Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., Bates, B., Cherney, L. R., Cramer, S. C., Deruyter, F., Eng, J. J., Fisher, B., Harvey, R. L., Lang, C. E., MacKay-Lyons, M., Ottenbacher, K. J., Pugh, S., Reeves, M. J., Richards, L. G., Stiers, W., Zorowitz, R. D., & American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research (2016). Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 47(6), e98–e169. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098

Zeiler, S. R., & Krakauer, J. W. (2013). The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Current opinion in neurology, 26(6), 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000025

Views:

18

Downloads:

8

Published
2025-12-29
Citations
How to Cite
Paweł Edyko, Zuzanna Przybyła, Katarzyna Andrzejewska, Wiktor Golus, Hubert Woźniak, Helena Szelka, Anna Maria Gęsińska, Krystian Czyżykowski, Alicja Babula, & Bartosz Golis. (2025). STROKE: PATHOGENESIS, TRADITIONAL AND MODERN NEUROREHABILITATION STRATEGIES – A REVIEW OF CURRENT METHODS. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 4(4(48). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4493

Most read articles by the same author(s)