THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) PRINTED COMPOSITE INLAYS AND ONLAYS: FIT ACCURACY, MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR, AND POST-PROCESSING VARIABLES: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Keywords: 3D Printing, Permanent Resin, Composite Inlays, Onlays, Post-Curing, Marginal Fit, Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing have introduced permanent photopolymer resins as potential alternatives for indirect restorative applications. This narrative review evaluated studies published between 2018 and 2025 that investigated the internal and marginal fit, mechanical performance, and post-processing parameters of 3D-printed permanent composite inlays and onlays. Data were obtained from PubMed using keywords related to 3D printing, dental resin composites, inlay, and onlay. Both in vitro and experimental studies were included without language restriction. The majority of included studies demonstrated clinically acceptable adaptation values for 3D-printed restorations, often comparable or superior to milled equivalents. However, fracture resistance and long-term stability remained less consistent, primarily due to variability in post-curing and polymer network maturation. Within current limitations, 3D-printed permanent composites present promising potential for indirect posterior restorations, yet milling continues to represent the clinical gold standard until post-processing and material standardization are achieved.

References

Balestra, D., Lowther, M., Goracci, C., Mandurino, M., Cortili, S., Paolone, G., Louca, C., & Vichi, A. (2024). 3D Printed Materials for Permanent Restorations in Indirect Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry: A Critical Review of the Literature. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 17(6), 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061380

Tian, Y., Chen, C., Xu, X., Wang, J., Hou, X., Li, K., Lu, X., Shi, H., Lee, E. S., & Jiang, H. B. (2021). A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning, 2021, 9950131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9950131

Pot, G. J., Van Overschelde, P. A., Keulemans, F., Kleverlaan, C. J., & Tribst, J. P. M. (2024). Mechanical Properties of Additive-Manufactured Composite-Based Resins for Permanent Indirect Restorations: A Scoping Review. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 17(16), 3951. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17163951

Ribeiro, H. F. B., Leite, J. V. C., Santos, J. V. D. N., de Araújo, E. G. O., Carvalho, L. I. M., da Silva, B. M., De Souza, G. M., & Lima, R. B. W. (2025). 3D-printed resin materials for indirect restorations-a scoping review and evidence gap map. European journal of oral sciences, e70042. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.70042

Ribeiro do Valle de Paiva, I., Stabile, V. M., Alonso, R. C. B., Puppin-Rontani, R. M., Correr-Sobrinho, L., & Correr, A. B. (2025). Simple post-curing methods to optimize the depth of cure and physicochemical properties of 3D printed resin. Journal of dentistry, 158, 105785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105785

Peskersoy, C., & Oguzhan, A. (2024). Evaluation of the Mechanical and Adhesion Characteristics of Indirect Restorations Manufactured with Three-Dimensional Printing. Polymers, 16(5), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16050613

D'haese, R., Hermans, C., Hauspie, J., & Vandeweghe, S. (2025). Fit and Fracture Load of Milled and 3D-Printed Composite Onlays: An In Vitro Study. The International journal of prosthodontics, 38(4), 424–429. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9081

Cantó-Navés, O., Michels, K., Figueras-Alvarez, O., Fernández-Villar, S., Cabratosa-Termes, J., & Roig, M. (2023). In Vitro Comparison of Internal and Marginal Adaptation between Printed and Milled Onlays. Materials, 16(21), 6962. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16216962

Özden, Y., & Altınok Uygun, L. (2025). Effects of postcuring times on the trueness of 3D -printed dental inlays made with permanent resins. Clinical oral investigations, 29(5), 244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06319-z

Ung, S., Veerasamy, A., Jansen van Vuuren, W. A., & Bennani, V. (2025). Effect of a Modified Preparation Design on the Marginal and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Onlays: A Feasibility Study. International journal of dentistry, 2025, 7599339. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/7599339

Daghrery, A., Vinothkumar, T. S., Majrashi, H., Faqihi, G., Gofshi, R., Almasoudi, S., Madkhali, R., Lam, W. Y. H., Lunkad, H., Chourasia, H., & Chaurasia, A. (2025). Dimensional accuracy of additive and subtractive manufactured ceramic-reinforced hybrid composite inlays: a CBCT-based in vitro study. Scientific reports, 15(1), 6048. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-90611-1

Pasha, S., Saleem, A., & Bilal, M. (2023). Evaluation of Internal Adaptation and Marginal Fit of Onlays Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design (CAD)-Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) and Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques: An In Vitro Study. Cureus, 15(6), e40020. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40020

Daher, R., Ardu, S., di Bella, E., Krejci, I., & Duc, O. (2024). Efficiency of 3D printed composite resin restorations compared with subtractive materials: Evaluation of fatigue behavior, cost, and time of production. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 131(5), 943–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.08.001

Hasanzade, M., Yaghoobi, N., Nematollahi, P., & Ghazanfari, R. (2023). Comparison of the marginal and internal fit of PMMA interim crowns printed with different layer thicknesses in 3D-printing technique. Clinical and experimental dental research, 9(5), 832–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.758

Al-Dulaijan, Y. A., Aldamanhori, R., Algaoud, H., Alshubaili, R., Alkhateeb, R., Alalawi, H., Abualsaud, R., Alqarawi, F. K., Al-Qarni, F. D., & Gad, M. M. (2024). Internal and marginal fits of 3D-printed provisional prostheses: comparative effect of different printing parameters. Frontiers in oral health, 5, 1491984. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1491984

Daghrery A, Lunkad H, Mobarki K, Alhazmi M, Khubrani H, Vinothkumar TS, Jabarti E. Marginal Discrepancy and Internal Fit of 3D-Printed Versus Milled Laminate Veneers: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024; 15(11):338. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb15110338

Lim, J. H., Shin, S. H., Jung, Y. E., An, H., & Kim, J. E. (2025). Influence of heat-assisted vat photopolymerization on the physical and mechanical characteristics of dental 3D printing resins. Scientific reports, 15(1), 1710. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85529-7

Kessler, A., Montenbruck, L., Schwendicke, F., Lüchtenborg, J., & Kaisarly, D. (2025). Narrative review of 3D-printed temporary and permanent dental resin restorations. Polymer Testing.

Rajasekaran, A., Chaudhari, P. K., Haldar, P., Vaiid, N., & Ludwig, B. (2025). Are the properties of 3D printed dental materials affected by nitrogen-rich postpolymerization? A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 133(4), 981.e1–981.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.016

Kim, M., Lee, J., Park, C., Jo, D., Yu, B., Khalifah, S. A., Hayashi, M., & Kim, R. H. (2024). Evaluation of Shear Bond Strengths of 3D Printed Materials for Permanent Restorations with Different Surface Treatments. Polymers, 16(13), 1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16131838

Tribst, J. P. M., Veerman, A., Pereira, G. K. R., Kleverlaan, C. J., & Dal Piva, A. M. O. (2024). Comparative Strength Study of Indirect Permanent Restorations: 3D-Printed, Milled, and Conventional Dental Composites. Clinics and practice, 14(5), 1940–1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050154

Alammar, A., Att, W., & Beuer, F. (2025). The Accuracy of 3D-Printed Fixed Dental Restorations. Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.], 37(4), 1047–1061. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13365

Alenezi, A., & Yehya, M. (2023). Evaluating the Accuracy of Dental Restorations Manufactured by Two CAD/CAM Milling Systems and Their Prototypes Fabricated by 3D Printing Methods: An In Vitro Study. The International journal of prosthodontics, 36(3), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7633

Views:

7

Downloads:

10

Published
2025-12-26
Citations
How to Cite
Karolina Buć, Łukasz Krzystek, Paweł Buć, Jagoda Józefczyk, Konrad Zieliński, Karolina Ganczar, Michał Mazurek, Marianna Rudzińska, Mikołaj Zalewski, & Stanisław Jurkowski. (2025). THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) PRINTED COMPOSITE INLAYS AND ONLAYS: FIT ACCURACY, MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR, AND POST-PROCESSING VARIABLES: A NARRATIVE REVIEW. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 5(4(48). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4389

Most read articles by the same author(s)