THE ROLE OF E-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES IN IMPROVING HEALTHCARE ACCESSIBILITY AND EQUITY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: E-health technologies have the potential to transform healthcare accessibility and quality for people with disabilities. However, multiple barriers limit their effective use and exacerbate health disparities. This narrative review aims to synthesize current knowledge on e-health interventions designed for disabled populations, identify challenges and best practices, and explore future perspectives to enhance health equity.
Review Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted using peer-reviewed articles, case studies, and official reports published primarily between 2013 and 2022. Searches were performed across databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on keywords related to e-health, disabilities, accessibility, and health equity. Literature was qualitatively analyzed to identify key themes around accessibility barriers, successful e-health implementations, strategic interventions, and emerging technologies.
State of Knowledge: Findings reveal that accessible design, digital literacy support, inclusive policies, community engagement, and robust privacy measures are critical for effective e-health adoption among people with disabilities. Case studies demonstrate improvements in healthcare access and outcomes when these factors are addressed. Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and virtual reality offer promising avenues for personalized and adaptive care. Nonetheless, economic, technological, and socio-cultural challenges persist, necessitating coordinated efforts across disciplines.
Conclusion: E-health holds significant promise to reduce health disparities for people with disabilities. Realizing this potential requires integrating universal design principles, enhancing digital inclusion, fostering policy reforms, and maintaining ethical vigilance. Collaborative, inclusive innovation can ensure that future digital health solutions contribute meaningfully to equitable healthcare and improved wellbeing for all.
References
Baxter, P., Kennedy, K., & Stirling, C. (2021). AI-powered virtual assistants for nonverbal autistic individuals: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51(7), 2473–2485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04615-0
Borg, J., Lindström, A., & Larsson, S. (2021). User involvement in e-health design for people with disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(14), 2054–2063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1779879
Brennan, D. M., Tindall, L. R., Theodoros, D. G., Brown, J., Campbell, M., Christiana, D., & Smith, D. (2021). A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines. International Journal of Telerehabilitation, 13(1), e6377. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2021.6377
Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., & Rogers, W. A. (2019). Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC Press.
Didden, R., Scholte, E. M., & Korzilius, H. (2018). Delivering cognitive behavioral therapy via mobile app to adults with intellectual disabilities: A pilot study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 72, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.11.010
Ellis, K., Haar, S., & Smith, A. (2019). User-centered design in mobile health apps for persons with disabilities: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(7), 673–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1465947
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.7785
Islam, S. M. R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M. H., Hossain, M., & Kwak, K.-S. (2021). The internet of things for health care: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Access, 7, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2872726
Kenny, G., Wilson, C., & Scott, R. (2019). Effectiveness of wearable fall detection devices in older adults: A community intervention. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 42(3), E34–E40. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000183
Krahn, G. L., Walker, D. K., & Correa-De-Araujo, R. (2015). Persons with disabilities as an unrecognized health disparity population. American Journal of Public Health, 105(S2), S198–S206. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302182
Lindeman, D. A., Kim, K. K., Gladstone, C., & Apesoa-Varano, E. C. (2020). Technology and health care for older adults. Generations, 44(1), 6–15.
Mace, R. (1997). Universal design: Barrier free environments for everyone. Designers West, 33(1), 147–152.
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Marsch, L. A., & Bartels, S. J. (2017). The future of mental health care: Peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015001067
Patel, S., Park, H., Bonato, P., Chan, L., & Rodgers, M. (2021). A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 19, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00920-0
Pramana, G., Sharma, D., & Gopal, N. (2019). Usability challenges in wearable devices for individuals with severe motor impairments: A review. Assistive Technology, 31(4), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2018.1436260
Roberts, E. T., & Mehrotra, A. (2020). Assessment of disparities in digital access among vulnerable populations. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(11), 1496–1497. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2707
Shakespeare, T., Ndagire, F., & Seketi, Q. E. (2021). Triple jeopardy: Disabled people and the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet, 397(10282), 1331–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00625-5
Shaw, S. E., Wherton, J., Vijayaraghavan, S., Morris, J., Bhattacharya, S., Hanson, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (2020). Supporting adoption of digital health technologies in healthcare: An interpretive policy analysis. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 25(3), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819619894048
Sunderji, N., Cairney, J., & Andersen, J. (2020). Telemedicine for spinal cord injury patients in rural settings: A mixed-methods evaluation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(25), 3643–3650. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1637910
Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
Veinot, T. C., Ancker, J. S., & Bakken, S. (2018). Health informatics and health equity: Improving our reach and impact. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(8), 963–967. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy052
Wieland, J., Martin, D. M., & Tournier, M. (2020). Assistive technology for communication and participation in healthcare: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(6), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1598564
World Health Organization. (2022). Global report on health equity for persons with disabilities. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063600
Zhou, X., Snoswell, C. L., Harding, L. E., Bambling, M., Edirippulige, S., Bai, X., & Smith, A. C. (2020). The role of telehealth in reducing the mental health burden from COVID-19. Telemedicine and e-Health, 26(4), 377–379. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0068
Views:
16
Downloads:
7
Copyright (c) 2025 Aneta Rasińska, Justyna Jachimczak, Justyna Matusik, Mateusz Kopczyński, Piotr Rzyczniok, Paulina Bala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
