EXPLORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ICT TOOLS FOR ONLINE TEACHING, LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT AMONG PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS FROM A GHANAIAN UNIVERSITY

Paul Kwame Butakor

doi:10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30062024/8162

Paul Kwame Butakor Department of Teacher Education, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0572-517X

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30062024/8162

Keywords: ICT Tools; Online Learning; Online Teaching; Online Assessment; Pre-Service Teachers

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, universities in Ghana have embraced the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools for online teaching, learning, and assessment. However, despite the increasing integration of these tools in education, there is a need to explore their effectiveness in enhancing students learning and educational outcomes. The purpose of this study was thus to explores the effectiveness of integrating ICT tools for online teaching, learning, and assessment in one of the Universities in Ghana. To achieve the purpose of this study, the quantitative descriptive survey design was adopted where a convenient sample of 301 pre-service teachers were selected through and surveyed. The data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and the results showed that majority of pre-service teachers perceived ICT tools as positive for online teaching, learning and assessment. However, challenges like technical skills, unreliable internet, limited access, training needs, academic integrity, support, and student engagement were highlighted as detrimental to online teaching, learning and assessment. The results further revealed interesting age differences in pre-service teachers’ viewpoints about effectiveness of ICT tools with older students perceiving ICT tools as more effective for online teaching and learning but less so for online assessment. It was thus recommended that there should be increased educator support and training on ICT integration in teaching and learning, promoting online student collaboration, soliciting ongoing student feedback, and targeted training on effective use of technology for learning for mature learners.

References

Ahmad, N. A., Elias, N.F., Sahari, N., & Mohamed. H. (2023). Learning management system acceptance factors for Technical and Vocational Education Training (TVET) institutions. TEM Journal. 12(2), Issue 2, 1156-1165. http://doi.org/10.18421/TEM122-61.

Barrett, H. C. (2011). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement: The REFLECT initiative. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(6), 436-449. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.50.6.2.

Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2006). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Schoolnet. http://colccti.colfinder.org/sites/default/files/ict_impact_report_0.pdf.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 1-18.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 139-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.

Chang, S. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2018) Impacts of an augmented reality-based flipped learning guiding approach on students’ scientific project performance and perceptions. Computers & Education, 125, 226-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.007.

Dillenbourg, P. (2017). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. Pergamon.

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. International handbook of research on teacher beliefs, 403.

Fraenkel R.J. & Wallen E.N. (2018) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International journal of research in education and science, 1(2), 175-191.

Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and learning with ICT Tools: Issues and challenges from teachers' perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4),2733-2744.

Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (2015). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computermediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.

Hu, J., Peng, Y., Chen, X., & Yu H (2021). Differentiating the learning styles of college students in different disciplines in a college English blended learning setting. PLoS One. 16(5): e0251545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251545.

Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Truelove, I., Levinson, P., Mayo, P., Ryberg, T., ... & Hayes, S. (2020). Teaching in the Age of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 1069-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00169-6.

Kaur, K. (2023). Teaching and learning with ICT tools: Issues and challenges. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijci.

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement.

Kolodner, J. L. (2002. Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 11-46.

Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.

Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building online learning communities: Effective strategies for the virtual classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/1007/s115280170195z.

Mishra,S. and Panda, S. (2007). Development and Factor Analysis of an Instrument to measure Students Attitude Towards e-learning, Asian Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), pp.27-33.

Picciano, A. G. (2021). Chapter 5 Theories and Frameworks for Online Education: Seeking an integrated model. In A Guide to Administering Distance Learning. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004471382_005.

Samoylenko, N., Zharko, L., & Glotova, A. (2022). Designing online learning environment: “ICT tools and teaching. Strategies. Athens Journal of Education, 9(1), 49-62.

Suleiman, M. M., Yahya, A. T., & Tukur, M. (2020). Effective utilization of ICT tools in higher education. Journal of Xidian University 14(9). https://doi.org/10.37896/jxu14.9/061.

Wang, Q. (2008). A generic model for guiding the integration of ICT into teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(4), 417-431.

Wiggins, G. (1993). Assessing student performance: Exploring the purpose and limits of testing. Jossey-Bass.

Warschauer, M., & Matuchniak, T. (2010). New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of research in education, 34(1), 179-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791.