THE INFLUENCE OF THE CODE OF ETHICS AND CODE OF CONDUCT ON PREVENTING CORRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN EMPLOYEES OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA (KPK RI)

  • Alfret J. Tilukay School of Strategic and Global Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia, Jalan Salemba Raya Nomor 4, Kenari, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
  • Basir School of Strategic and Global Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia, Jalan Salemba Raya Nomor 4, Kenari, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
  • Chryshnanda Dwilaksana School of Strategic and Global Studies, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia, Jalan Salemba Raya Nomor 4, Kenari, Kec. Senen, Kota Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia
Keywords: Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct, Prevention of Corrupt Behavior, KPK

Abstract

This study discusses the influence of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for KPK personnel which includes 5 (five) basic values, namely: integrity, synergy, fairness, leadership, and professionalism towards preventing corrupt behavior among KPK employees. Integrity, synergy, fairness, and leadership are placed as independent/exogenous variables while professionalism is placed as a moderating variable. The research objective is to answer the formulation of the problem which includes 9 research questions. The research method uses a quantitative approach through SEM (Structural Equation Model) analysis. The number of samples was 321 people who were calculated based on the Slovin formula and were taken using a proportionate random sampling technique, in this case, the KPK employees who came from State Civil and Assigned Civil Servants. Variable operationalization uses indicators that have been formulated in the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for KPK Employees, namely as stated in Perdewas KPK Number 2 of 2021, and from various theories. From the results of the study, it was concluded that there is a positive and significant influence of Integrity, Synergy, and Leadership variables on Professionalism and Prevention of Corrupt Behavior among Employees at the KPK. The justice variable was found to have no significant effect. This means that if the quality of the three variables that have had this influence is improved, it will be followed by an increase in professionalism and prevention of corrupt behavior. Fundamental improvements are needed regarding aspects of justice, which include the creation of a conducive work environment and perceptions of fairness in the fulfillment of employee welfare to improve the variables of justice.

References

Bauman, D.C. 2013, “Leadership and the three faces of integrity”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 3, 414-426.

Brown, M.E., Trevino, L.K., Harrison, D.A., 2005. “Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing”. Organizational behaviour and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 97.

Collier, M. W. 2002. “Explaining corruption: An institutional choice approach. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol.10, doi:10.1023/A:1019802614530.

Cressey, D.R. 1973, Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement, Patterson Smith.

Dahanayake, Pradeepa, et.al. 2018. “Justice and fairness in the workplace: a trajectory for managing diversity”, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, Vol. 37 No. 5, 470-490.

Gildenhuys dalam Cressey, D.R. 1973, Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement, Patterson Smith.

Greenberg, J. 1987, “A taxonomy of organizational justice theories”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, 9-22.

Hair, J.F.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Holtström, Johan dan Anderson, Helen. 2021. “Exploring and extending the synergy concept – a study of three acquisitions”, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36/13, 28–41.

House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. 2002. “Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to Project GLOBE”. Journal of World Business, 37, 3–10.doi:10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4.

Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Sully de Luque, M., & House, R. J. 2006. “In the eye of the beholder: Cross cultural lessons in leadership from project GLOBE”. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 67–90. doi:10.5465/AMP.2006.19873410.

Jehanzeb, Khawaja dan Mohanty, Jagannath, 2020. “The mediating role of organizational commitment between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behavior: Power distance as moderator”, Personnel Review, Vol. 49 No. 2, 445-468.

Jones, David Seth. 2016. “Combatting corruption in Brunei Darussalam”, Journal of Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol. 5 No. 2.

Kapeli, Nur Shafiqa dan Nafsiah Mohamed. 2019. “Battling corruption in Malaysia: What can be learned?”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 26 No. 2.

Kaptein, M. 2003, “The diamond of managerial integrity”, European Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 1, 99-108.

Kolthoff, E., Erakovich, R. and Lasthuizen, K. 2010, “Comparative analysis of ethical leadership and ethical culture in local government: the USA, The Netherlands, Montenegro and Serbia”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 23 No. 7, 596-612.

Kong, Dejun Tony dan Volkema, Roger. 2016. “Cultural Endorsement of Broad Leadership Prototypes and Wealth as Predictors of Corruption”. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Kratcoski, Peter C, Edelbacher, Maximilian. 2018. Fraud and Corruption: Major Types, Prevention, and Control. Springer. Switzerland.

Lukito, Anastasia Suhartati. 2016. “Building anti-corruption compliance through national integrity system in Indonesia: A way to fight against corruption”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 23 No. 4.

Miller, Larry S, Braswell, Michael C, dan Rush, Chris. 2017. Effective Police Supervision Study Guide Edisi 8. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York

Mutula, S. and Wamukoya, J.M. 2009, “Public sector information management in east and southern Africa: implications for FOI, democracy and integrity in government”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 29 No. 5, 333-341.

Peltier-Rivest, Dominic. 2018. “A model for preventing corruption”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 25 No. 2.

Prabowo, Hendi Yogi, et.al. 2018. “Forgetting corruption: unlearning the knowledge of corruption in the Indonesian public sector”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 25 No. 1. 28-56.

Quah, Jon S.T. 2020. “Combating police corruption in five Asian countries: a comparative analysis”, Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol. 9 No. 2.

Resick, C. J., Martin, G. S., Keating, M. A., et.al. 2011. “What ethical leadership means to me: Asian, American, and European perspectives”. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 435–457. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0730-8.

Rizvi, Meher and Elliot, Bob. 2005. “Teachers’ perceptions of their professionalism in government primary schools in Karachi, Pakistan”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 33, No. 1.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2003. Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Said, Jamaliah, et.al. 2016. “Relationship between good governance and integrity system: Empirical study on the public sector of Malaysia”, Humanomics, Vol. 32 No. 2, 151-171.

Schafer, Joseph A. 2010. “Effective leaders and leadership in policing: traits, assessment, development, and expansion”, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, Vol. 33 No. 4.

Steers. Richard M. 2002. Efektivitas Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Stone-Johnson, Corrie. 2017. “Autonomy, professionalism, and the role of generation in in China”, International Business School Suzhou, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China.

Szymanski, S. (2007), How to Implement Economic Reforms: How to Fight Corruption Effectively in Public Procurement in SEE Countries, OECD Publications, Paris.

Tan, C. 2014, “Organizational justice as a predictor of organizational silence”, Educational Research and Reviews, Vol. 9 No. 21, 1190-1202.

Thibault, Edward A. et.al. 1998. Proactive Police Management, diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia Manajemen Kepolisian Proaktif oleh Kunarto. New York: Upper Saddle River.

Transparency International Indonesia. 2021. Indeks Persepsi Korupsi 2020: Korupsi, Respons Covid-19 dan Kemunduran Demokrasi. Diakses dari https://ti.or.id/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-2020-korupsi-respons-covid-19-dan-kemunduran-demokrasi/ pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2021

Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R.N. 2007, “Integrity: a systems theory classification”, Journal of Management History, Vol. 13 No. 1,.

Troman, G. 1996, “The rise of the new professionals? The restructuring of primary teachers’ work and professionalism”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 17 No. 4.

Van Dijk, E., & De Cremer, D. 2006. “Self-benefiting in the allocation of scarce resources: Leader–follower effects and the moderating effect of social value orientations”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1352–1361. doi:10.1177/0146167206290338.

Wu, Guangzhen dan Makin, David A. et.al. 2018. “Police integrity in China”, Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 41 No. 5, 563-565.

Yen, Yung-Shen, 2020. “Exploring the synergy effect of trust with other beliefs in television shopping”, Management Decision, Vol. 58 No. 3, 2020, 428-447.

Views:

257

Downloads:

185

Published
2022-12-30
Citations
How to Cite
Alfret J. Tilukay, Basir, & Chryshnanda Dwilaksana. (2022). THE INFLUENCE OF THE CODE OF ETHICS AND CODE OF CONDUCT ON PREVENTING CORRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR IN EMPLOYEES OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA (KPK RI). International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (4(36). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122022/7920