PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF SLEEP QUALITY
Abstract
The article describes some psychological factors of sleep quality. Theoretical analysis of psychological factors that affect the quality of sleep is presented. Sleep quality is an important part of a person's overall health. Sleep problems can be associated with decreased physical and mental health, limitations in daily activities, cognitive impairment. Given these consequences, there is a need for a better understanding of the factors associated with the improvement and deterioration of sleep quality. The relevance of this problem in the context of modern research. The results of an empirical study that reveals the relationship between sleep quality and some psychological factors are highlighted. It was found that the average score of sleep quality indicates unsatisfactory sleep quality. It was found that there are significant differences between the groups of subjects with satisfactory and unsatisfactory indicators of the overall score of sleep quality on the scales of neuroticism and depression. In people who are dissatisfied with the quality of sleep, the level of neuroticism is close to high and there is moderate depression. The relationships between sleep quality indicators and psychological factors have been identified, and their features have been analyzed. In general, these relationships demonstrate: emotional inadequacy does not contribute to a better subjective quality of sleep; depressive or anxious symptoms, emotional instability do not contribute to rapid falling asleep, but contribute to sleep disorders and daytime dysfunction; anxious characteristics affect the reduction of sleep time.
References
Åkerstedt, T., Hume, K., Minors, D., & Waterhouse, J. (1994). The meaning of good sleep: a longitudinal study of polysomnography and subjective sleep quality. Journal of sleep research, 3(3), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.1994.tb00122.x
Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., 3rd, Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R., & Kupfer, D. J. (1989). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry research, 28(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
Chen, J. H., Waite, L., Kurina, L. M., Thisted, R. A., McClintock, M., & Lauderdale, D. S. (2015). Insomnia symptoms and actigraph-estimated sleep characteristics in a nationally representative sample of older adults. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 70(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu144
Edinger, J. D., Fins, A. I., Glenn, D. M., Sullivan, R. J., Jr, Bastian, L. A., Marsh, G. R., Dailey, D., Hope, T. V., Young, M., Shaw, E., & Vasilas, D. (2000). Insomnia and the eye of the beholder: are there clinical markers of objective sleep disturbances among adults with and without insomnia complaints?. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68(4), 586–593.
Harvey, A. G., Stinson, K., Whitaker, K. L., Moskovitz, D., & Virk, H. (2008). The subjective meaning of sleep quality: a comparison of individuals with and without insomnia. Sleep, 31(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/31.3.383
Harvey, K. J., & Espie, C. A. (2004). Development and preliminary validation of the Glasgow Content of Thoughts Inventory (GCTI): a new measure for the assessment of pre-sleep cognitive activity. The British journal of clinical psychology, 43(Pt 4), 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144665042388900
Moul, D. E., Nofzinger, E. A., Pilkonis, P. A., Houck, P. R., Miewald, J. M., & Buysse, D. J. (2002). Symptom reports in severe chronic insomnia. Sleep, 25(5), 553–563.
Тхостов, А. Ш., & Рассказова, Е. И. (2009). Психологические факторы хронической инсомнии и субъективная и объективная картина сна. Вестник Томского государственного университета, (323), 331-335.
Views:
809
Downloads:
413
Copyright (c) 2021 Denisiievska Anna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.