INTERPRETATION CHALLENGES OF ENGLISH ANALYTICAL TERMS FOR EFL LEARNERS: A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF SEMANTIC TRANSPARENCY AND CONTEXTUAL CUES

Keywords: Analytical Terms, Semantic Transparency, EFL Learners, Term Interpretation, Polysemy, Context

Abstract

This study explores the interpretation challenges posed by English analytical terms among B2-level EFL learners, emphasizing the multidimensional factors that influence semantic comprehension. Analytical terms—lexical units encoding complex, domain-specific concepts—are ubiquitous in academic and professional discourse but often lack semantic transparency, creating significant cognitive and linguistic barriers for non-native speakers. Employing a mixed-methods design, the research investigates learner engagement with selected terms from the EMN (European Migration Network) Asylum and Migration Glossary across three stages: a structured questionnaire, a multiple-choice test on isolated terms, and a contextualized comprehension task. The analysis examines how linguistic phenomena such as polysemy, synonymy, and homonymy contribute to semantic ambiguity and misinterpretation, and evaluates the role of contextual metadata—definitions, examples, and usage cues—in facilitating accurate comprehension. Findings indicate that learners struggle to interpret analytical terms when presented in isolation, particularly when lexical components do not transparently reflect the underlying institutional or conceptual meaning. Terms such as talent partnership and single permit exemplify how semantic opacity and cross-contextual variation hinder intuitive understanding. However, comprehension improves markedly when terms are embedded in authentic discourse, underscoring the importance of contextual framing.

The study also identifies learner strategies for decoding and retaining specialized vocabulary, including contextual inference, morphological analysis, and reliance on prior domain exposure. By integrating linguistic, cognitive, and contextual dimensions, this research contributes to both terminology studies and EFL pedagogy. It highlights the pedagogical imperative to incorporate term-focused instruction into curriculum design and to develop targeted resources that enhance learners’ accuracy, fluency, and confidence in navigating academic and professional texts.

References

Agustín-Llach, M. P. (2023). Mapping the mental lexicon of EFL learners: A network approach. Research in Language, 21(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2023-0018

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.

Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, methods and applications. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Cruse, D. A. (2020). Polysemy versus homonymy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001

Faber, P., & León-Araúz, P. (2016). Specialized knowledge representation and the parameterization of context. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00196

Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. Teachers College Press.

International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO 704:2022 — Terminology work—Principles and methods. https://www.iso.org/standard/81599.html

Saeed, J. I. (2023). Semantics (5th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921

Temmerman, R. (2000). Towards new ways of terminology description: The sociocognitive approach. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.3

Wright, S. E., & Budin, G. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of terminology management: Volume 2 Application-oriented terminology management. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Yousefi, M. H., & Biria, R. (2018). The effectiveness of L2 vocabulary instruction: A meta-analysis. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0062-2

Views:

45

Downloads:

18

Published
2025-11-11
Citations
How to Cite
Zhuzhuna Gumbaridze, & Tamta Popkhadze. (2025). INTERPRETATION CHALLENGES OF ENGLISH ANALYTICAL TERMS FOR EFL LEARNERS: A LINGUISTIC STUDY OF SEMANTIC TRANSPARENCY AND CONTEXTUAL CUES. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (4(48). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(48).2025.4025