THE PROBLEMATIC OF INTERPRETING RELIGIOUS TEXTS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF JÜRGEN HABERMAS AND ITS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE

  • Latroche Ahmed Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oran 2 – Algeria
Keywords: Hermeneutics, Habermas, Religious Interpretation, Public Sphere, Communicative Rationality, Modernity

Abstract

This paper explores the philosophical approach of Jürgen Habermas to the interpretation of religious texts, focusing on how communicative rationality can serve as a tool for meaningful dialogue within the modern public sphere. It addresses the epistemological and hermeneutic challenges posed by the reinterpretation of religious traditions in contemporary societies, where secular and pluralistic values often clash with inherited religious meanings. On the basis of Habermas's communicative action theory and his engagement with modern hermeneutics, this study examines how rational discourse can foster mutual understanding and uncover the deeper layers of meaning embedded in religious language. Particular attention is given to the distinction between discursive and nondiscursive validity claims, the role of language in shaping public reasoning, and the potential of interpretation as a means of cultural integration and ethical reflection. By connecting Habermas's ideas with broader hermeneutic traditions and thinkers such as Mohammed Arkoun and Paul Ricœur, the paper highlights the critical function of interpretation in negotiating the boundaries between faith and reason, tradition and modernity. Ultimately, the study affirms that the rational reinterpretation of religious texts is essential to fostering inclusive dialogue and sustaining democratic coexistence in pluralistic societies.

References

Erich Fromm, Beyond the Illusions, trans. Salah Hatim (Syria: Dar Al-Hiwar, 2012), 65.

Mourad Ben Kassim, Philosophical Meanings of Communication and Symbolic Systems, 22.

Mourad Ben Kassim, Philosophical Meanings of Communication and Symbolic Systems, 23.

Al-Jahiz, Al-Bayan wa al-Tabyin, vol. 1, ed. Abd al-Salam Harun (Beirut: Dar al-Jil, n.d.), 76.

Edgar Morin, La Méthode: La Connaissance de la Connaissance (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1986), 27–28.

Edgar Morin, Introduction à la pensée complexe (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2005), 2.

Edgar Morin, Thought and the Future: An Introduction to Complex Thinking, trans. Ahmed Al-Qaswar and Mounir Al-Jouji (Casablanca: Dar Toubkal, 2004), 9.

Karl-Otto Apel, Thinking with Habermas Against Habermas, trans. Omar Mehibel (Beirut: Arab Scientific Publishers, 2005), 13.

Ibid., 13.

Ibid., 34.

Jürgen Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, op. Cit.., vol. 1, 85.

Jürgen Habermas, Idealisation and Communication, op. cit.., 30.

Ibid., 30.

Jürgen Habermas, Truth and Justification, 215.

Jürgen Habermas, The Logic of the Social Sciences, 287.

Jürgen Habermas, Truth, 181.

Jürgen Habermas, The Ethics of Discourse and the Question of Truth, 70.

Jürgen Habermas, The Logic of the Social Sciences, 295.

Ibid., 285.

Manfred Frank, The Limits of Communication: Consensus and Dispute between Habermas and Lyotard, trans. Izz al-Arab Lahkim Benani (Casablanca: Afrique Orient, 2003), 10.

P. Malval and J.-M. Delmaudin, Communication: Theories and Practices (Paris: Person Éducation, 2005), 11.

Ibid., 12.

Pierre V. Zima, Text and Society: Horizons of the Sociology of Criticism, 228.

Sigmund Freud, The Future of an Illusion, 64.

Pierre V. Zima, Text and Society: Horizons of the Sociology of Criticism, trans. Antoine Abu Zeid, ed. Maurice Abu Nader (Beirut: Arab Organisation for Translation, 2013), 229.

Mohammed Abed al-Jabri, The Formation of Arab Reason (Beirut: Centre for Arab Unity Studies, 10th ed., 2009), 136.

Laurent Fleury, Max Weber, trans. Mohammad Ali Maqlad (Lebanon: Dar al-Jadida, 2008), 63.

Views:

40

Downloads:

24

Published
2025-05-23
Citations
How to Cite
Latroche Ahmed. (2025). THE PROBLEMATIC OF INTERPRETING RELIGIOUS TEXTS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF JÜRGEN HABERMAS AND ITS REPRESENTATIONS IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (2(46). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.2(46).2025.3356