LEGISLATIVE PROBLEM OF EXCLUDING A PARTNER FROM THE COMPANY ON THE EXAMPLE OF GEORGIA (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS)

  • Ketevan Kokrashvili доктор юридических наук, профессор, Грузинский технический университет, Грузия
  • Lasha Gorgadze доктор государственного управления, приглашенный преподаватель, Грузинский технический университет, Грузия
Keywords: Fiduciary duties of the partner, exclusion of a partner (removing a partner) from the company, Corporate legislation of Georgia

Abstract

The issue of excluding a partner (removing a partner) from the company is one of the most important, very sensitive and controversial issues in corporate law. The legislation of different countries regulates this issue in different ways, but it is important that most countries, together with the decision of the General Meeting of Partners, to exclude a partner, require a relevant court decision that has entered into legal force. On the basis of a comparative analysis, the presented article discusses the possible reasons for the exclusion of a partner and the issues of legal regulation of the exclusion procedure. The fiduciary duties of a partner are analyzed as one of the important reasons for the exclusion of a partner from the company. Special attention is paid to legislative gaps and to the heterogeneity of the case law of Georgia in connection with the exclusion of a partner from the company. However, the article discusses the shortcomings of the new draft law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, it is worth mentioning that the draft law was developed on the basis of the Association Agreement between Georgia and the European Union. Under this agreement, Georgia undertook an obligation to integrate Georgian corporate law into EU corporate law, in addition, in our opinion, the positions presented in the article will significantly develop and improve such an important institution of corporate law as the exclusion of a partner from the company.

References

Art, R. C. (2003). Shareholder rights and Remedies in case of Corporations: Opression, Fiduciary Duties, and Reasonable expectations, [28 Iowa J. Corp. L. 317]. The Journal of Corporation Law, 9.

Gelb, H. (1997). The Corporate Opportunity Doctrine – Recent Cases and the Elusive Goal of Clarity.

Müller, K.J. (2009). The GMBH. A Guide to the German Limited Liability Company. 2nd ed. München: Beck.

Paula J. Dalley. (2001). To Whom It May Concern: Fiduciary Duties and Business Associations, [26 Del. J. Corp. L. 515]; Edward Gartenberg, Tiffany King, Fiduciary Duties in Partnerships. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 3.

Puala J. Dalley. (1990). The Law of Partner Expulsions: Fiduciary Duty and Good Faith, Cardozo Law Review, [Vol 21-181], 190.

Schawrtz, J. (2005). Good Faith in Partner Expusion: Application of a Contract Law Paradigm, Chapman Law Review, 2005 [9 Chap. L.Rev.1], 4.

Zubitashvili, N. (2014). Exclusion of a partner from a limited liability company. Collection of Corporate Law, 161-162. Retrieved from https://tsu.ge/assets/media/files/8/Publications/sakorporacio-krebuli-2.pdf

Григорьев, К.М. (2015). Фидуциарные обязанности в российском и английском праве. Акционерное общество: вопросы корпоративного управления. №1. Retrieved from https://gaap.ru/articles/Fidutsiarnye_obyazannosti_v_rossiyskom_i_angliyskom_prave/

Карапетов, А. (2014). Исключение акционера из непубличного АО: выбор оптимальной модели регулирования. Москва. Получено из https://zakon.ru/blog/2014/10/28/isklyuchenie_akcionera_iz_nepublichnogo_ao_vybor_optimalnoj_modeli_regulirovaniya

Кузнецов, А. (2014). Исключение участника из общества с ограниченной ответственностью. Москва, Статут.

Views:

277

Downloads:

247

Published
2021-03-16
Citations
How to Cite
Ketevan Kokrashvili, & Lasha Gorgadze. (2021). LEGISLATIVE PROBLEM OF EXCLUDING A PARTNER FROM THE COMPANY ON THE EXAMPLE OF GEORGIA (COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS). International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (1(29). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30032021/7459