TO THE STUDY OF THE SEMANTICS OF THE VERB
Abstract
In this article, verbal lexemes are classified according to the nomination of the activity of nouns. Consequently, they are called upon to denote what is the “characteristic activity” of nouns of specific semantic classes, semantic thematic series and individual lexemes, as well as to the principle of generalization of different semantic classes, a group of thematic series, which is proved on specific verb examples and it is necessary to conclude that verbs can be divided into verbs of narrow and wide nominations, Depending on the semantic structure of verbs, their direct and figurative meanings differ, Often the potential seme of a verb is a concretizer and indicates the semantic class, groups and thematic series of nouns, and thus the verb actualizes its meaning in speech.
The starting point of this work is the fact that "there are no objects without properties and relations and properties and relations without objects", therefore, verbs as well as nouns can be subjected to such classifications as nouns, where nouns of being, abstractness, concreteness, animate, inanimate are distinguished, anthroponymy, faunonymy, as well as certain semantic groups, thematic series and at the level of individual lexemes, as indicated by specific examples.
Thus, we have to conclude that the verb is designed in the language to designate the characteristic activity of certain nouns, combining with it in speech its actual meaning is revealed and thereby determines its relevance to a particular semantic class, semantic groups or thematic series, and thus the verbs of a narrow and a wide nomination from a wide nomination. Depending on the semantic structure of the verbs, their direct and figurative meanings differ. Often a potential seme of a verb is a concretizer and indicates the semantic class, groups and thematic series of nouns, and thus the verb actualizes its meaning in speech.
References
Мещанинов И.И. Глагол. – М.-Л.: АН СССР, 1949.
Арутюнова А.Р. Лексические и семантические классы глаголов в немецком языке: Автореф. Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. М. 1966.
Brunot F. La pensée et la langue. 3-me éd. –Paris: Masson, 1953.
Бородина М.А. Семантико-грамматические группы в глаголе современного французского языка. - Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. – Л., 1946.
Кацнельсон С.Д. Послесловие к кн.: У.Л. Чейф. Значение и структура языка. – М.: Прогресс, 1975.
Абрамов Б.А. О понятии семантической избирательности слов. – В кн. Инвариантные семантические значения и структура предложения. – М.: Наука, 1969.
Уемов А.И. Вещи, свойства и отношения. М.: АН СССР, 1963.
Konrad H. Etude sur la métaphore, 2 éd. – Paris: Vrin, 1958.
Мамадалиев А. «Семантическая классификация лексических единиц на основе оппозитивного метода» в Роман ва герман тилшунослигининг долзарб масалалари. Илмий-амалий коференция материаллари. ЎДЖТУ, Тошкент 2009.
Виноградов В.В. Основные типы лексических значений слов. – ВЯ, 1953, No5.
Еременко Т.Ю. К проблеме категории одушевленности – неодушевленности в системе французского глагола: Сб. науч. трудов /МГПИИЯ им. М. Тореза, вып.94. – М.,1976.
Гак В.Г. Беседы о французском слове. М.: Международные отношения, 1966.
Илия Л.Н. Грамматика французского языка. 2-е изд. – М.: Высшая школа, 1964.
Уринов А. Группа симметричных глаголов: Автореф. Дис. ... канд. филол. наук. – М., 1971.
Views:
315
Downloads:
253
Copyright (c) 2021 Mamadaliev Ahmadali, Karimova Nodirakhon Abdurashidovna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.