Keywords: Digital Constitutionalism, Platform Liability, Social Media, Bill of Rights, Digital Rights, Internet Bill of Rights, Terms of Use


Multiple challenges and risks to democratic values and fundamental human rights emerge from the constitutulization processes of social media platforms. This article submits that more consideration has to be put on how private governance of social media platforms should be transparent, consensual, relatively stable in its application and how it should be enforced fairly. The values presented by the rule of law as well as traditional democratic principles of a sovereign state should inform the debate around contested relationship between the users and social media platforms. Digital constitutionalism is a concept that explains waves of constitutional counteractions as a result of a fast pace development of digital technologies. Digital constitutionalism is regarded as the idea that considers the constitutionalism of the digital society. This article focuses on examining constitutional tone of existing terms of service of a world leading social media platform Facebook and reviews potential value that digital Bills of Rights, intiated by various non-governmental organizations and individuals, may hold in shaping  human rights’ compliant governance framework for social media platforms in the years to come. From the terms of service and bills of rights, it is based to show that Facebook is ready to show a peculiar configuration. At present, social media bills of rights and terms of service play the constitutionalizing roles.  Nevertheless, it is not the aim of the current author to exhaust the topic, but rather to provide potential answers to the matters examined.


Abbasi, S. G. (2017). “Internet As A Public Space For Freedom Of Expression: Myth Or Reality,” SSRN Electronic Journal. Elsevier BV,

Abu Al-Haija, Q., Mao, Q., & Al Nasr, K. (2019). “Forecasting the Number of Monthly Active Facebook and Twitter Worldwide Users Using ARMA Model”. Journal of Computer Science, 15(4), 499–510.

Bache, I., Bartle, I. and Flinders, M., (2016). Multi-level Governance. In Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). Handbook on Theories of Governance (pp. 486–499). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Batorski, D., & Grzywińska, I. (2017). “Three dimensions of the public sphere on Facebook”. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 356–374.

Beck, U. (2015). What Is Globalization? John Wiley & Sons.

Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and Society (Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies). Oxford University Press.

Celeste, E. (2018). “Terms of service and bills of rights: new mechanisms of constitutionalization in the social media environment?” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(2), 122–138.

Celeste, E. (2019). “Digital constitutionalism: a new systematic theorization”. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(1), 76–99.

Dahlberg, L. (2007). “Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation”. New Media & Society, 9(5), 827–847.

Davies, T. (2014). “Digital Rights and Freedoms: A Framework for Surveying Users and Analyzing Policies”. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 428–443.

Drymiotou, E. (2015). “Preliminary Thoughts on Malfunction and Concentric Circles; A Theory of Judicial Review in Human Rights Adjudication”. SSRN

Drymiotou, E. (2019). Human Rights, Constitutional Law and Belonging: The Right to Equal Belonging in a Democratic Society (Routledge Research in Human Rights Law) (1st ed.). Routledge.

Durazo Herrmann, J. (2016). “Media and subnational democracy: the case of Bahia, Brazil”. Democratization, 24(1), 81–99. Retrieved from

Facebook (2020). Facebook Terms of Service. Retrieved from

Facebook (2020). Facebook Community Standards. Retrieved from

Fiedler, A. and Meyer, M., (2015). “A quasi-public sphere: Letters to the editor in the German Democratic Republic”. Javnost-The Public, 22(2), pp.181-195.

Fischer-Lescano, A. (2016). “Struggles for a global Internet constitution: protecting global communication structures against surveillance measures”. Global Constitutionalism, 5(2), 145–172.

Fisk, N. W. (2016). Framing Internet Safety: The Governance of Youth Online (From The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning) (1st ed.). The MIT Press.

Floridi, L. (2016). “On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy”. Philosophy & Technology, 29(4), 307–312.

Fried, B. H. (2002). “If You Don’t Like It, Leave It: The Problem of Exit in Social Contractarian Arguments”. SSRN Electronic Journal, 40–70.

Global Network Initiative (2012). Protecting and Advancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in Information and Communication Technologies.

Grimmelmann, J. (2008). “Saving Facebook”. NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08/09-7, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 94, p. 1137.

Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) (Sixth Printing ed.). The MIT Press.

Hunsaker, A., & Hargittai, E. (2018). “A review of Internet use among older adults”. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3937–3954.

Internet Rights and Principles Coalition. (2014). The Charter of Human Rights and Principles on the Internet. Internet Governance Forum.

Joerges, C., Sand, I., Teubner, G., & Collins, H. (2004). Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (International Studies in the Theory of Private Law). Hart Publishing.

Joseph, S. (2011). “Social Media, Human Rights and Political Change”. SSRN Electronic Journal, 145–146.

Kauppi, N. (2018). Democracy, social resources and political power in the European Union. Amsterdam University Press.

Klabbers, J., Peters, A., & Ulfstein, G. (2009). The Constitutionalization of International Law. (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.

League Against Racism and Antisemitism (LICRA), French Union of Jewish Students, v Yahoo! Inc. (USA), Yahoo France, Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (The County Court of Paris), Interim Court Order, (Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (The County Court of Paris). November 20, 2000. Electronic Business Law Reports, (2001), 1(3) 110-120.

Le Conseil Constitutionnel. (1789, August 26). Declaration of Human and Civic Rights of 26th of August 1789. Retrieved from

Leite Gonçalves, G., & Costa, S. (2015). “The global constitutionalization of human rights: Overcoming contemporary injustices or juridifying old asymmetries?” Current Sociology, 64(2), 311–331.

Mancini, F. (2000). Democracy and Constitutionalism in the European Union. Van Haren Publishing.

Moore, A. (2012). “Facebook and the Liberal Arts”. The Journal of General Education, 61(3), 264.

Nazarov, M. (2018). “Modern media landscape: diversity and fragmentation”. Социологические Исследования, 8, 54–64.

Noesselt, N. (2016). “Contested global order(s): Rising powers and the re-legitimation of global constitutionalization”. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(3), 639–656.

Opsahl, K. (2019, May 10). A Bill of Privacy Rights for Social Network Users. Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Pernice, I. (2018). “Risk management in the digital constellation – a constitutional perspective (part II)”. IDP Revista de Internet Derecho y Política, 27, 84–94.

Peters, A. (2015). “Constitutional Fragments On the Interaction of Constitutionalization and Fragmentation in International Law”. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Peters, G. and Pierre, J. (2006, June 22). Handbook of Public Policy. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Pincus, J. (2011). Liminal States embracing apparent contradictions, diversity and change: What Next For The Social Network Users’ Bill Of Rights? Talesfromthe.Net.

Přibáň, J. (2016). The Concept of Law in Global Societal Constitutionalism in Cowan, D and Wincott, D. (Eds.). Exploring the ‘Legal' in Socio-Legal Studies pp. 57-79. Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Qin, J. (2015). “Hero on Twitter, Traitor on News”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(2), 166–184.

Redeker, D., Gill, L., & Gasser, U. (2018). “Towards digital constitutionalism? Mapping attempts to craft an Internet Bill of Rights”. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 302–319.

Robertson, A. (2018, April 5). Facebook used to be a democracy — but nobody voted. The Verge.

Santaniello, M., Palladino, N., Catone, M. C., & Diana, P. (2018). “The language of digital constitutionalism and the role of national parliaments”. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 320–336.

Schmitz, S., & Berndt, C. (2018). “The German Act on Improving Law Enforcement on Social Networks (NetzDG): A Blunt Sword?” SSRN Electronic Journal.

Schneiderman, D. (2016). On Suffering and Societal Constitutionalism: At the Border of International Investment Arbitration and Human Rights in Kahana, T. & Scolnicov, A. (Eds.), Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights: Human Rights, Private Actors, and Positive Obligations (pp. I-Ii.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Illustrated ed.). Currency.

Seifert, J.W., (2003 January). A primer on e-government: Sectors, stages, opportunities, and challenges of online governance. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service.

Shaw, A. (2014). “The Internet Is Full of Jerks, Because the World Is Full of Jerks: What Feminist Theory Teaches Us About the Internet”. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 11(3), 273–277.

Shefa, M.C. (2018). “First Amendment 2.0: Revisiting Marsh and the Quasi-Public Forum in the Age of Social Media”. Harvard University Law Review, 41, p.159.

Statista., 2019a. Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of the 2nd quarter of 2019 (in millions). Retrieved from

Steger, M. B. (2017). Globalization: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions) (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Sterling, B. (2020, November 18). The Ello bill of rights for social network users. Wired.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press.

Suzor, N. (2018). “Digital Constitutionalism: Using the Rule of Law to Evaluate the Legitimacy of Governance by Platforms”. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 205630511878781.

Suzor, N., Van Geelen, T., & Myers West, S. (2018). “Evaluating the legitimacy of platform governance: A review of research and a shared research agenda”. International Communication Gazette, 80(4), 385–400.

Teubner, G. (2003). “Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional Theory”. Storrs Lectures 2003/04 Yale Law School.

Tsesis, A. (2017). “Terrorist Speech On Social Media”. 70 Vanderbilt Law Review 651.

Tushnet, M. (2017). “The Possibility of Illiberal Constitutionalism”. Florida Law Review, Vol.69 Iss. 6, Art. 1 pp.1367-1384

Worldometer (2020). Countries in the World by Population (2020). United Nations Population Division. Retrieved from





How to Cite
Nino Shengelia. (2020). CONSTITUTIONALIZING ROLE OF TERMS OF SERVICE OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS AND PROPOSED SOCIAL MEDIA USER BILLS OF RIGHTS. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (7(28).