THEORETICAL REFLECTION ON THE CONCEPT OF PERCEIVED QUALITY FROM AN ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
This paper is dedicated to exploring the subjective dimension of architectural quality, emphasizing the importance of understanding how individuals perceive architectural structures and spaces. To fully grasp this perception, it is essential to examine the multifaceted elements that capture the observer's attention, including the style, scale, form, color palette, and spatial organization of the building. Each of these factors contributes to the way a structure is experienced and interpreted, either in isolation or as part of an integrated whole. The combination of these elements can provoke a wide array of responses, ranging from aesthetic appreciation to emotional reaction, and thus, architectural design becomes a dynamic process that engages various facets of human experience. This paper aims to contribute to the body of knowledge surrounding architectural quality. The insights gained through this exploration hold the potential to inform and inspire design practices that foster greater aesthetic, functional, and emotional resonance with the individuals who engage with these spaces. Given the diverse and individualized nature of these responses, it is crucial to consider perception as a complex phenomenon in itself, one that not only encompasses sensory input but also emotional, cognitive, social, and cultural factors that influence how a building is perceived. Understanding this phenomenon allows architects and designers to identify the specific qualities that may enhance the effectiveness of their designs.
References
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity : capitalizing on the value of a brand name. Free Press ; Toronto.
Ariffin, S., Yusof, J. M., Putit, L., & Shah, M. I. (2016). Factors influencing perceived quality and repurchase intention towards green products. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30142-3
Arnheim, R. (1985). The other Gustav Theodor Fechner. A Century of Psychology as Science. 856–865. https://doi.org/10.1037/10117-052
Asshidin, N. H., Abidin, N., & Borhan, H. B. (2016). Perceived quality and emotional value that influence consumer's purchase intention towards American and local products. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 639–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00078-2
Böckenhoff Ewald, & Hamm, U. (1983). Perspektiven des Marktes Für Alternativ Erzeugte Nahrungsmittel. Univ. Hohenheim, Inst. für Agrarpolitik und Landw. Marktlehre.
Box, J.M.F. (1983), "Product Quality Assessment by Consumers — the Role of Product Information", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 83 No. 3/4. 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb057308
Chaudhuri, A. (2002). How brand reputation affects the advertising-brand equity link. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-42-3-33-43
Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does “product quality really mean? Sloan Management Review, 26: 25-43.
Giordano, J. L. (2006). L’approche qualité perçue (Éditions d’Organisation). Groupe Eyrolles.
Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000004784
Harries, K. (2000). The ethical function of Architecture. MIT Press.
Hjorth-Andersen, C. (1984). The concept of quality and the efficiency of markets for consumer products. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1086/209007
Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran's Quality Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
Kim, C., Zhao, W., & Yang, K. H. (2008). An empirical study on the integrated framework of e-CRM in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 6(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeco.2008070101
Kuehn, A. A., & Day, R. L. (1962). Strategy of product quality. Harvard Business Review.
Kupsch, P., Hufschmied, P., Mathes, H. D., & Schöler, K. (1978). Die Struktur von Qualitätsurteilen und das informationsverhalten von Konsumenten Beim Kauf Langlebiger Gebrauchsgüter. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88605-7
Leatherbarrow, D., & Mostafavi, M. (2005). Surface architecture. Mit Press.
Lecourtois, C. (2009). Quelles qualités pour l’espace architectural ? Revue Du Réseau Activités et Métiers de l’Architecture et de l’Urbanisme (RAMAU), 5(2009), 71–87.
Lutz, R. (1986). Quality is as quality does: An attitudinal perspective on consumer quality judgments. In Presentation to the Marketing Science Institute Trustees’ Meeting, Cambridge, MA.
Maynes, E. S. (1976). Decision-making for consumers: An introduction to consumer economics. Macmillan.
Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. (2006). How does objective quality affect perceived quality? short-term effects, long-term effects, and asymmetries. Marketing Science, 25(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1050.0175
Nasar, J. L. (1989). Perception, cognition, and evaluation of urban places. In I. Altman & E. H. Zube (Eds.), Public places and spaces: Human behavior and environment: Vol. 10 (pp. 31-56). New York: Plenum.
Olson, J. C. & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association of Consumer Research, ed. M. Venkate-San. Association for Consumer Research, Iowa City, 167-79.
Olson, J., & Reynolds, T. (1983). Understanding Consumers’ Cognitive Structures: Implications for Advertising Strategy. In L. Percy, & A. Woodside (Eds.), Advertising and Consumer Psychology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Oude Ophuis, P. A. M., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (1995). Perceived quality: A market driven and consumer oriented approach. Food Quality and Preference, 6(3), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293 (94)00028-t
Oxenfeldt, A. R. (1950). Consumer knowledge: Its measurement and extent. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 32(4), 300. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925578
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, VA. & Berry, L.L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64: 12-40.
Pollio, V., & Morgan, M. H. (1960). Vitruvius: The ten books on architecture. Dover Publications.
Rönn, M. (2014). Quality in Architecture - A Disputed Concept. ARCC Spring Research Conference. Detroit, Michigan,USA.
Snoj, B., Pisnik Korda, A., & Mumel, D. (2004). The relationships among perceived quality, perceived risk and perceived product value. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420410538050
Sprott, D. E., & Shimp, T. A. (2004). Using product sampling to augment the perceived quality of store brands. Journal of Retailing, 80(4), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.10.006
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21(4), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-a
Tsiotsou, R. (2006). The role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00477.x
Yazdanfar, S. A., Heidari, A. A., & Aghajari, N. (2015). Comparison of architects’ and non-architects’ perception of place. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.071
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
Hamdaoui, A.E.D., Adad, M.C. (2020). Enhancing Perceived Quality and Comfort Optimization Through a Parametric CAD/Simulation-Based Process. In: Hatti, M. (eds) Smart Energy Empowerment in Smart and Resilient Cities. ICAIRES 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 102. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37207-1_30
Views:
70
Downloads:
74
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdeldjalil Hamdaoui, Mohamed Cherif Adad, Ismahane Haridi, Ahmed Mounir Ansar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
