PARTICIPATORY APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE TYPE OF PROTECTION OF MARITIME HERITAGE IN URBAN REGENERATION PROJECTS OF WATERFRONTS - CASE OF THE PORT OF ALGIERS

  • Nour El Houda Bouchefirat Département of Architecture, University Abderrahmane-Mira, 22 Targa ouzemour, Béjaïa Algeria
  • Djamel Dekoumi Institute of Urban Technology Management University salah boubnider · Ali Mendjeli, El Khroub, Constantine, Algeria
Keywords: Maritime Heritage, Delphi Method, Type of Protection, Regeneration, Waterfront, Port of Algiers

Abstract

Coastlines are closely linked to the development of civilizations, as essential places for anchoring commercial and military activities, and for innovation in the forms and techniques of appropriation of the sea, which has produced throughout history a stratification of maritime heritage in the coastal area, today threatened with degradation and disappearance mainly due to natural and climatic conditions and the accelerated urbanization of the coastline, at a time when this heritage can constitute a powerful lever for revitalizing the waterfronts. The historic port of Algiers, the subject of this research, bears witness to a great historical and typological wealth in terms of maritime heritage. Being an integral part of the major regeneration project of the Bay of Algiers, major socio-cultural and economic issues are linked to the choice of the degree of protection of the site's buildings. The objective of this research is to propose a participatory and sustainable approach for the classification of maritime legacies according to their type of protection in the urban regeneration process of the waterfront of the Bay of Algiers, in order to identify development strategies that respect both the spirit of the place and allow the social and economic development of the urban space. To achieve the objective, the Delphi method. This made it possible to structure the evaluation tool and weight the criteria. The established tool is composed of 24 criteria classified according to 5 aspects; architectural quality, historical interest, social role, economic impact and state of conservation. The approach chosen in this study has the advantage of being global, transferable and adaptable to similar decision-making contexts.

References

Ali, K., Arezou, S., Sapura, M., Mu’azu, A., Hamidah, A., Nurul, M.D. & Majid, K. (2018). A sustainable historic waterfrontrevitalization decision support tool for attracting tourists.Sustainability 10(2): 215.

Barron , G . (2021). Revealing maritimity in 19th century France, Available at : http://journals.openedition.org/artefact/10175 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/artefact.10175

Beinat, E. (1997). Value functions for environmental management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bianchini, F., Bloomfield, J. (2012) Porous Cities. On Four European Cities, Eurozine, 3rd July, Available at: https://www.eurozine.com/porous-cities/.

Bianchini, F., Parkinson, M. (eds) (1993) Cultural policy and urban regeneration: The west European experience, Manchester, Manchester Press.

Braccini,S. (2022) .Design strategies for the recovery and enhancement of lighthouse: some case studies of the Ligurian Sea in TEMA, Technologies Engineering Materials Architecture, volume 8 (1) ,Available at: https://rivistatema.com/design-strategies-for-the-recovery-and-enhancement-of-lighthouse-some-case-studies-ofthe-ligurian-sea/

Brownhill, S. (2011) Just Add Water. Waterfront Regeneration as a Global Phenomenon, in Leary, M. E., Mccarthy, J. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration, London, Routledge, pp 45-55.

Cambridge dictionary, 2020,Available at :https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/

Chaline, C., Rodrigues-Malta, R. (1994). Ces ports qui créèrent des villes. Editions l’Harmattan, 300 p.

Choay, F. L’Allégorie du patrimoine, Paris, Éd. Du Seuil, 1992, 273 p.

Clémenta, O., Madecb .P .(2006).Un outil pour la construction d’indicateurs de développement durable : la méthode Delphi in Natures Sciences Sociétés. Volume 14, (3).

Collin ,M . (1995). Ville et port XVIIIème-XXème siècles. Collection maritime. Ed. L’Harmattant. Paris. 292 p.

Collin M. (2003). Ville portuaire, acteur du développement durable. Collection maritime. Ed. L’Harmattant. Paris. 200. p.

Evans, G., SHAW, P. (2004) The contribution of Culture to Regeneration in the UK: a review of evidence, London.

Keyvanfar. A., Shafaghat, A., Sapura, M,. Mu’azu ,M., Hamidah A .,Nurul., Mohd ,D .,& Majid, K, A. (2018 ). Sustainable Historic Waterfront Revitalization Decision Support Tool for Attracting Tourists. Sustainability, Volume 10 (2).

Kin ,V. Rollet .A Senkel P & Jan F. (2021). Génération et sélection d’idées dans le processus d’innovation : cas de la méthodologie Delphi dans la logistique 4.0, In Innovations, De Boeck Université, volume 10(3), pages 109-138.

Krippendorff, K. (2013) .Content Analysis. An Introduction to Its Methodology ,3rd edition, CA Sage Publications, California.

Molotch, Harvey L. (1976). Toward a More Human Ecology. Land Economics 43 (August),pp 41-336.

Ozenfant, L.(2020). Le patrimoine maritime bâti comme levier de développement durable des villes portuaires de taille petite et moyenne : mise en oeuvre d’une recherche appliquée au territoire breton. Doctoral thesis, University of bretagne occidentale.

Péron F., Marie G. (2012) – Les logiques de construction du patrimoine maritime culturel : de l’émergence du concept à sa prise en compte dans les politiques territoriales. Proceedings of the International Conference Patrimoine culturel et désirs de territoires : vers quels développements ? Nîmes, 25-27 févier 2010, L’Harmattan, pp. 103-116.

Prelorenzo C., 1999. Les édifices et espaces portuaires ou l’invitation à la grande dimension Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine n° 82, 0180-930-III-99/82/p. 101-108 379

Prelorenzo C., 2010. Le retour des villes portuaires in dynamiques des ports méditerranéens. N°80. Les cahiers de Méditerranée. pp. 157-167

Schubert, D. (2008) Transformation Processes on Waterfronts in Seaport Cities – Causes and Trends between Divergence and Convergence. Ed. Port Cities as Areas of Transition: Ethnographic Perspectives, Bielefeld, Transcript Verlag.pp.25-46.

Shen ,L .,Mohd Sarman ,A., & Bin, M .,Wei ,G & Jiang, M .(2023), Adaptive Reuse of Port Heritage Leads to Urban Waterfront Regeneration: A Proposed Case Study in Zh zhou City China . Jurnal Kejuruteraan, volume 35(2), Available at: https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2023-35(2)-22.

Tommarchi,E. (2020). Port Cities, Heritage Cities. A comparative perspective on maritime cultural quarters . Journal of RETE volume 9.

Vigarie .A., (1992). La mer omniprésente. 330 km de côtes. Études Normandes, 41e année, n°2. La Manche à la veille de l'an 2000. pp. 72-88.

Zukin, S. (2006). The Cultures of Cities, Cambridge and Oxford, Blackwell.

Views:

30

Downloads:

19

Published
2024-12-13
Citations
How to Cite
Nour El Houda Bouchefirat, & Djamel Dekoumi. (2024). PARTICIPATORY APPROACH FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE TYPE OF PROTECTION OF MARITIME HERITAGE IN URBAN REGENERATION PROJECTS OF WATERFRONTS - CASE OF THE PORT OF ALGIERS. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (4(44). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(44).2024.3039