TRADE LIBERALIZATION, STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM MONGOLIA

  • Bolor Khurelchuluun School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, China https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8710-3962
  • Siqintana Bao Institute of Rural Economic and Information, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural &Animal Husbandry Sciences, China
Keywords: Trade Openness, Import Tariff, Structure Change, Productivity Growth, Mongolia

Abstract

We analyze how Mongolia's trade openness affects labor market structural changes and its contribution to manufacturing productivity growth. Our findings indicate that reducing import tariffs on intermediate goods resulted in a 1.70% shift of labor from state-owned enterprises (SOEs) to non-SOEs from 2001 to 2015, accounting for 2.96% of intra-industry labor flow. Intermediate import tariff reduction decreased costs for non-SOEs and alleviated financing constraints. Additionally, the shift in employment ownership due to trade openness improved resource allocation efficiency, explaining 3.51% of production efficiency growth from inter-enterprise factor allocation and 0.81%-1.12% of overall manufacturing productivity growth. This highlights its role as a key channel for enhancing productivity through trade openness.

References

Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K., & Frazer, G. (2015). Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators. Econometrica, 83(6), 2411–2451. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA13408

Agustina, F. S. (2018). Import competition and local labor markets: The case of Indonesia. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol10.iss2.art6

Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007). Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1611–1638. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.5.1611

Atkin, D. (2016). Endogenous skill acquisition and export manufacturing in Mexico. American Economic Review, 106(8), 2046–2085. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1257/aer.20120901

Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China syndrome: Local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2121–2168. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.6.2121

Balsvik, R., Jensen, S., & Salvanes, K. G. (2015). Made in China, sold in Norway: Local labor market effects of an import shock. Journal of Public Economics, 127, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.08.006

Dauth, W., Findeisen, S., & Suedekum, J. (2014). The rise of the East and the Far East: German labor markets and trade integration. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(6), 1643–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12092

Donoso, V., Martín, V., & Minondo, A. (2015). Do Differences in the Exposure to Chinese Imports Lead to Differences in Local Labour Market Outcomes? An Analysis for Spanish Provinces. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1746–1764. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.879982

Holappa, V. (2022). The impact of the Chinese import shock on Finnish regional labor markets. Journal of the Finnish Economic Association, 3(1). https://journal.fi/jfea/article/view/126796

Jermakowicz, W., & Kozarzewski, P. (1996). Privatization in Mongolia. CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research. https://ideas.repec.org/p/sec/cnstan/0103.html

Kis-Katos, K., & Sparrow, R. (2015). Poverty, labor markets and trade liberalization in Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.005

Marshall, R., Nixson, F., & Walters, B. (2007). Privatisation and regulation in an Asian transitional economy: The case of Mongolia. Public Administration and Development, 27(5), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.454

McCaig, B., & Pavcnik, N. (2018). Export markets and labor allocation in a low-income country. American Economic Review, 108(7), 1899–1941. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1257/aer.20141096

Melitz, M. J. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467

Pavcnik, N. (2002). Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants. The Review of Economic Studies, 69(1), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00205

Pierce, J. R., & Schott, P. K. (2016). The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1632–1662. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1257/aer.20131578

Topalova, P. (2010). Factor immobility and regional impacts of trade liberalization: Evidence on poverty from India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 1–41. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1257/app.2.4.1

Yu, M. (2015). Processing trade, tariff reductions and firm productivity: Evidence from Chinese firms. The Economic Journal, 125(585), 943–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12127

Views:

64

Downloads:

53

Published
2024-12-12
Citations
How to Cite
Bolor Khurelchuluun, & Siqintana Bao. (2024). TRADE LIBERALIZATION, STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH: EVIDENCE FROM MONGOLIA. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (4(44). https://doi.org/10.31435/ijitss.4(44).2024.2962