JUDGE'S DECISION ON LEGALIZATION AND/OR LICENSING OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES

Moh. Yusuf Bachtiyar; Hanif Nur Widhiyanti; Herman Suryokumoro

doi:10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122022/7889

Moh. Yusuf Bachtiyar Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya
Herman Suryokumoro Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122022/7889

Keywords: District Court Decision, Judge's Decision, Legalization and/or Licensing, Interfaith Marriage

Abstract

This study intends to explore and evaluate the wording of legality and licensing of interfaith weddings as mentioned in the Purwokerto District Court Decision No. 54/Pdt.P/2019/PN. Pwt. and the Surabaya District Court Decision No. 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby. In addition to studying and assessing the basis of the ratio decidendi used by courts to determine the legality of marriages between individuals of different religions, as required by law. This form of investigation is legal investigation. This investigation will employ the Statute Approach, Case Approach, and Conceptual Approach. The findings suggest that the conflict between the necessity of recording marriage events in state papers and the necessity of marital validity must end immediately. Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law is extremely subjective, allowing for multiple interpretations, and at the level of implementation, these norms are very easily prepared, allowing them to be implemented and gain state legitimacy without requiring individuals to abandon their religion or original beliefs. The state must be present to defend the beliefs of its citizens, uphold its fundamental rights, and legitimize all legal activities conducted by its residents. Decision No. 68/PUU-XII/2014 of the Constitutional Court affirmed that religious law must be a factor in evaluating the validity or invalidity of marriage, including the invalidity of interfaith marriages. Consequently, the Constitutional Court's Decision No. 68/PUU/XII/2014 has instructed and offered instructions for the right, fair, and scientific reading, understanding, and interpretation of Article 2 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 in accordance with legal science.

References

Fitriyani, F. (2021). Analisis Putusan MK NO 13/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Larangan Nikah Dalam Satu Instansi Perspektif Maqashid Al-Syari’ah. Indonesian Journal of Law and Islamic Law, 3(1), 1–37.

Habibah, U. (2022). Tinjauan Kompilasi Hukum Islam terhadap Permohonan Dispensasi Nikah di Bawah Umur. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(1), 42–57.

Islamiyati. (2017a). Implikasi Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi NO. 68/PUU/XII/2014 Terhadap Penyelundupan Hukum Nikah Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Al Ahkam, 27(2).

Islamiyati, I. (2017b). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 68/Puu/Xii/2014 Kaitannya Dengan Nikah Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Al-Ahkam, 27(2), 157–178.

Lailam, T. (2018). Penataan kelembagaan pengujian norma hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 206–230.

Mahmud, P. M. (2016). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada.

Margono. (2019). Asas keadilan, kemanfaatan & kepastian hukum dalam putusan hakim. Sinar Grafika.

Mertokusumo, S. (2002). Mengenal Hukum (Suatu Pengantar), Cetakan Ketiga. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Nim, G. S. G. (2021). Analisis Hukum Pertimbangan Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Permohonan Pengujian Uu No. 1/1974 Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Berdasarkan Putusan No. 68/Puu-Xii/2014 Tentang Syarat Sah Perkawinan. Jurnal Fatwa Hukum, 4(1).

Sari, M. F., & Mulyadi, Y. (2016). Analisis Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 68/puuxii / 2014 Atas Pasal 2 Ayat (1) Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 Terhadap Perkawinan Beda Agama. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 1–13.

Sekarbuana, M. W., Widiawati, I. A. P., & Arthanaya, I. W. (2021). Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(1), 16–21.

Setiarini, L. D. (2021). Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 19(1), 45–55.

Setiyanto, D. A. (2016). Perkawinan Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 68/PUUXII/ 2014 Dalam Persperktif HAM. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 9(1), 13–30.

Sunarto, S. (2016). Prinsip Hakim Aktif Dalam Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(2), 249–276.

Tarring, A. D. (2022). Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 9(4), 288–296.

Vela, R. (2016). Analisis yuridis terhadap akibat hukum putusan mahkamah konstitusi nomor 68/PUUXII/ 2014 tentang pembatalan perkawinan pasangan beda agama terhadap hak dan kewajiban anak perkawinan beda agama. SKRIPSI-2016.

Wahyuni, S. (2017). Nikah Beda Agama: Kenapa ke Luar Negeri? Pustaka Alvabet.

Yuningsih, D. (2015). Eksistensi Perkawinan Agama Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 68/PUU-XII/2014 Dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkawinan. Al-‘Adl, 8(2).