RURAL DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION MEASURES
Abstract
The study wants to show methods for evaluating rural development in Romania, in the context of joining the European Union. The methodologies used are analysis and synthesis and they are usefull for private and public sector in helping them find new ways to improve rural life with European funds. The current interest in global and regional development is determined by the need to address and solve within national economic policies some new difficulties, generated in the context of the restructuring and reform processes triggered in the central and eastern regions of the continent. According to the Territorial Development Strategy of Romania 2035, the evaluation activities compare the achievements from certain moments of the implementation of the strategy with the previously proposed targets, including the way of implementing specific policies. Accession to the European Union was the strongest pressure factor for the rapid reform of the Romanian rural economy, given the need to integrate into the European rural economy, the European model being based on a competitive, market-oriented sector, performing public functions, such as: protecting the environment, offering more convenient residential settlements for the rural population, as well as the integration of agriculture with the environment and forestry. The general research hypothesis of the study consists in the assumption that the study of the rural space in Romania, in the context of the implementation of programs with European funds, will lead to a clearer identification of the problems and to finding better solutions for the development of the rural environment.
References
Cojanu V., Botezatu E., Peleanu Ion. Working Paper Formulation of the operational concepts of a policy of cohesion and competitiveness. EIR Working Papers Series, No. 22. Retrieved from http://ier.gov.ro/wp-content/uploads/publicatii/WP_22.pdf
Retrieved from https://www.mdlpa.ro/userfiles/Fonduri_EU_autoritatitile_publice_locale.pdf
Mazăre S. Procedural and administrative solutions and mechanisms applied by AFIR to make the management of European funds PNDR 2020 more efficient - Proceedings of the international symposium - Health through education, volume V / 2020, V edition of Romania - ISSN - 2559-5636, page 274.
Roberto Cagliero, Francesco Licciardo, Marzia Legnini. The Evaluation Framework in the New CAP 2023–2027: A Reflection in the Light of Lessons Learned from Rural Development. Journals Sustainability. Volume 13. Issue 10. 10.3390/su13105528. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5528/htm
Esposti, R.; Sotte, F. Sviluppo Rurale e Occupazione (Rural Development and Employment); Franco Angeli Publishers: Milan, Italy, 1999; pp. 1–294. ISBN 8846419243.
Van der Ploeg, JD; Long, A.; Banks, J. Living Countrysides. Rural Development the State of the Art, in Living Countryside, Rural Development Processes in Europe: The State of the Art; Elsevier: Doetinchem, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 1–231. ISBN 9789054391173.
Sotte, F. Rural development and sectorial and territorial policy implications. An evolutionary approach (Rural development and sectoral and territorial policy implications. An evolutionary approach). In Politics, Governance and Innovation for Rural Areas; Cavazzani, A., Gaudio, G., Sivini, S., Eds.; Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane: Naples, Italy, 2006; pp. 61–80.
Mantino, F. Lo Sviluppo Rurale in Europe. Politiche, Istituzioni e Attori Locali dagli Anni '70 ad Oggi (Rural Development in Europe. Policies, Institutions and Local Actors from the 1970s to Today); Edagricole–New Business Media: Milan, Italy, 2008; pp. 1–312. ISBN 9788850652549.
Retrieved from https://enrd.ec.europa.eu/leader-clld_fr
Leonardi, I.; Sassi, M. The EU Rural Development Model from Theory to Implementation: Still an Open Challenge. Quaderno di Ricerca n. 6.; Copyland: Pavia, Italy, 2004.
Pulina, P. La valuation delle politiche per lo sviluppo rurale nella prospettiva post 2020 (Evaluating rural development policies in the post-2020 perspective). Agriregionieuropa 2018, 52. Retrieved from https://agriregionieuropa.univpm.it/it/content/article/31/52/la-valutazione-delle-politiche-lo-sviluppo-rurale-nella-prospetti va-post-2020.
European Commission. The Future of Food and Farming–For a Flexible, Fair and Sustainable Common Agricultural Policy; EU Publications Office: Luxembourg.
Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_4841
Matthews, A. Introducing a Development Policy Perspective into CAP Strategic Plans. TEP Working Paper No. 0319; Trinity Economics Papers–Department of Economics: Dublin, Ireland, 2019. Retrieved from https://www.tcd.ie/Economics/TEP/2019/tep0319.pdf
The National Strategic Plan (PNS) Retrieved from https://www.madr.ro/planul-national-strategic-pac-post-2020/documente-de-programare.html
Agra CEAS Consulting. Synthesis of Rural Development Mid-Term Evaluation 2005. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/cmef/ruralareas/synthesis-rural-development-mid- term-evaluations_en
Countryside and Community Research Institute. Assessing the Impact of Rural Development Policy (incl. LEADER) 2010. Deliverable D3.2. Retrieved from http://dspace.crea.gov.it/handle/inea/734
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (European Commission). Ex-Post Evaluation of Rural Development Programs 2000–2006; Publications Office of the EU: Luxembourg, 2013.
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (European Commission). Synthesis of Mid-Term Evaluations of Rural Development Programs 2007–2013; Publications Office of the EU: Luxembourg, 2013.
Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (European Commission). Synthesis of Rural Development Programs (RDP) Ex-Post Evaluations of Period 2007–2013; Publications Office of the EU: Luxembourg, 2020.
Smismans, S. Policy evaluation in the EU: The challenges of linking ex ante and ex post appraisal. Eur. J. Risk Reg. 2015, 6, 6–26.
Dwyer, J.; Bradley, D.; Hill, B. Towards an enhanced evaluation of European rural development policy reflections on United Kingdom experience. Rural Economy. 2008, 307, 53–79.
General Directorate for Agriculture and Rural Development Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/agriculture-and-rural-development_ro
Regulation (EEC) no. 2052/88. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/1988/2052/oj
Mantino, F.; Monteleone, A.; Pesce, A. Monitoring and Evaluating the Structural Funds 2000–2006; INEA: Rome, Italy, 2000.
Commission of the European Communities. Evaluating Socio-Economic Programs; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, 1999; Volumes 1–6 MEANS Collection.
Commission of the European Communities. A Framework for Indicators for the Economic and Social Dimensions of Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development; Agriculture Directorate-General: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
Cagliero, R.; Cristiano, S. Valuation and rural development programs: Approaches, methods and experiences; (Evaluating Rural Development Programs: Approaches, Methods and Experiences); INEA: Rome, Italy, 2013; pp. 6–111. ISBN 978-88-8145-2910.
Mantino, F.; Monteleone, A.; Pesce, A. Monitoring and Evaluating the Structural Funds 2000–2006; INEA: Rome, Italy, 2000.
Cagliero, R.; Cristiano, S. Valuation and rural development programs: Approaches, methods and experiences; (Evaluating Rural Development Programs: Approaches, Methods and Experiences); INEA: Rome, Italy, 2013; pp. 6–111. ISBN 978-88-8145-2910.
Monteleone, A. Quale il futuro della politica di sviluppo rurale? (What is the future of rural development policy?). Pagri/IAP Agricultural Policy. International 2006, 1, 63–81.
Mantino, F. The Reform of EU Rural Development Policy and the Challenges Ahead. Notre Eur. Policy Pap. 2010, 40. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49294/
Mantino, F.; Monteleone, A.; Pesce, A. Monitoring and Evaluating the Structural Funds 2000–2006; INEA: Rome, Italy, 2000.
Dax, T.; Oedl-Wieser, T.; Strahl-Naderer, W. Altering the evaluation design for rural policies. Eur. Struct. I'm investigating. Funds J. 2014, 2, 141–152.
Monteleone, A. Quale il futuro della politica di sviluppo rurale? (What is the future of rural development policy?). Pagri/IAP Agricultural Policy. International 2006, 1, 63–81.
Mantino, F. The Reform of EU Rural Development Policy and the Challenges Ahead. Notre Eur. Policy Pap. 2010, 40. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/49294/
Mantino F.; Monteleone A.; Pesce A. Monitoring and Evaluating the Structural Funds 2000–2006; INEA: Rome, Italy, 2000.
Mantino, F. Lo Sviluppo Rurale in Europe. Politiche, Istituzioni e Attori Locali dagli Anni '70 ad Oggi (Rural Development in Europe. Policies, Institutions and Local Actors from the 1970s to Today); Edagricole–New Business Media: Milan, Italy, 2008; pp. 1–312. ISBN 9788850652549.
Guidelines for the mid term evaluation of rural development programs 2000-2006 supported from the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund. DOC. STAR VI/43517/02. Retrieved from https://docplayer.net/18978524-Guidelines-for-the-mid-term-evaluation-of-rural-development-programmes-2000-2006-supported-from-the-european-agricultural- guidance-and-guaranteefund.html
Mantino F. (2003). Rural Development Policies in the European Union after Agenda 2000: Assessment and future prospects, in OECD, The future of Rural Policy. From sectoral to place-based policies in rural areas, OECD Publications, Paris. Retrieved from https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/08/ruraldevelopmentreformmantinoneoct10-1.pdf
Mantino F. (2005). The Reform of EU Rural Development Policy and the Challenges ahead. Our Europe. p.52. Retrieved from https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/08/ruraldevelopmentreformmantinoneoct10-1.pdf
Regulation (EC) no. 1257/99.
Mantino F. (2003). Rural Development Policies in the European Union after Agenda 2000: Assessment and future prospects, in OECD, The future of Rural Policy. From sectoral to place-based policies in rural areas, OECD Publications, Paris. Retrieved from https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ruraldevelopmentreformmantinoneoct10-1.pdf
Bryden John M. (2000): Is there a "New Rural Policy"? In European Rural Policy at the Crossroads, International Conference organized by The Arkleton Center for Rural Development Research, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.
Dwyer Janet, Baldock David, Beaufoy Guy, Bennett Harriet, Lowe Philiph and Ward Neil. (2002). Europe's Rural Futures. The nature of rural development II: rural development in an enlarging European Union, WWF and Land Use Policy Group, IEEP, London.
Dwyer J. et al (2008): Review of Rural Development Instruments (DG Agri project 2006-G4-10), Final Report.
Saraceno, Elena (2002): Rural development policies and the "second pillar". In West European Working Group: Future role of agriculture in Europe, ARL, Hannover, Germany.
John M. Bryden, Francesco Mantino. Rural policy in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323655953_Rural_policy_in_Europe
Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/food-farming-fisheries/key-policies/common-agricultural-policy/rural-development/previous-rdp-periods_en
Reg. (EC) No. 1260/99.
Reg. (EC) No. 1257/99.
The European Commission. (1999). Evaluation of the RDP 2000-06. Instructions. STAR VI / 8865/99
STAR VI/12004/00.
Cagliero R.; Cristiano S. Valuation and rural development programs: Approaches, methods and experiences; (Evaluating Rural Development Programs: Approaches, Methods And Experiences); INEA: Rome, Italy, 2013; pp. 6–111. ISBN 978-88-8145-2910.
Reg. (CE) 950/96.
Reg. (EC) 951/96.
Reg. (CE) 1257/99.
STAR 12204/00.
National evaluation system. Ministry of Education. Ministry of University and Research. Retrieved from https://www.miur.gov.it/sistema-nazionale-di-valutazione
Views:
106
Downloads:
97
Copyright (c) 2022 Silvia Mazare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
