HOW TO PROMOTE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING

  • Mkhitaryan Y. S PhD, Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Khachatur Abovian Armenian State Pedagogical University, Armenia, Yerevan
Keywords: critical thinking, university students, survey, Armenian educational system, strategy, theoretical class

Abstract

Promoting students’ critical thinking in Armenian universities is not an easy task and this can be explained historically. In the past it was not a usual practice for students to challenge the views of professors, lectures being usually taken without retorting or questioning. Though some radical changes have taken place in the Armenian educational system during the last two or three decades, the old tradition is still preserved in some national universities. The aim of the present paper is to show what strategies can be applied to promote university students’ critical thinking, particularly in theoretical classes. The strategies chosen for this purpose include: psychological preparation, stimulating interest, identifying the problem, suggesting related sources, evaluating the problem indirectly, solving the problem independently, making cross-linguistic references, mastering scientific language register. A survey was conducted to assess the level of the students’ critical thinking during Theoretical English Grammar Course. The results show that out of 34 students involved in the survey only 35 % could actually display critical thinking ability, the rest making tentative, probing steps only.

References

Trilling B. and C. Fadel (2009) 21 century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.

Cox J. (2016) Teaching Strategies to Promote Critical Thinking /teaching-strategies- promote-critical-thinking>

Weimer M1 (2013) Assessing Critical Thinking Skills. The George Washington GSEHD Home › Art. New Jersey: Ablex, Norwood ›

Weimer M . (2013) Critical Thinking: Definitions and Assessments. https://www.facultyfocus.com

Blokh M.T. Semionova, S. Timofeyeva (2004) Theoretical English Grammar. Seminars. Moscow: Visshaya Shkola.

Scott F.S., C.C. Bowley, C.S. Brockett, J.G. Brown, P.R. Goddard (1980) English Grammar. A Linguistic Study of its Classes and Structures. London: Fakenham Press Limited.

Mkhitaryan Y.and A.Cubaryan (2013) Theoretical English Grammar. Yerevan: YSU Press.

Keshishian F. (2013) Culture and Classroom Communication:A Pilot Study in the Post-Soviet Republic of Armenia. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research. pp.252-274.

Halpern D. (1996) How to promote student reflection and critical thinking

Eldridge G. (2010) Enhancing Critical Thinking for All Students. Online Articles <http://...in two elements of algebra for all students.

Crockett L.W. (2017) 12 Strong Strategies for Effectively Teaching Critical Thinking Skills. https://globaldigitalcitizen.org.

Elder L. and R. Paul (2010) Critical Thinking Development: A Stage Theory www.criticalthinking.org.

Manning A. (2008) English for Language and Linguistics in Higher Education Studies

https://www.garneteducation.com/app/uploads/2014/12/ESAP-Lang-and-Ling-TB2

Chomsky and his critics:

Radford A. (1988) Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons J. (1971) Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Bornstein D. (1984) An Introduction to Transformational Grammar. Lanham:University Press of America.

Oller, Jr. J.W. (1977) On the Relation between Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics. < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249932491

Jahn M. (2002) ”Colorless green ideas sleep furiously”: A Linguistic Test Case and Its Appropriations< www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/jahn>

Franciosi S. (2014) Teaching Students to Categorize TOEFL Essay Topics // English Teaching, FORUM, vol 52, No4, pp. 28-35.

Payne Th.E. (2011) Understanding English Grammar. Cambridge University Press.

Mkhitaryan Y.and S. Tumanyan (2014) On Differences in the Use of Hedges in English and Armenian Academic Discourse. // Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier Ltd. pp 2006-2011

Crismore A. and R. Farnsworth (1990) Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse// Writing Scholar. Studies in Academic Discourse ed. by W. Nash, Newbury Park, Ca.Sage.

Views:

463

Downloads:

94

Published
2018-07-12
Citations
How to Cite
Mkhitaryan Y. S. (2018). HOW TO PROMOTE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING. World Science, 1(7(35), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ws/12072018/5998