COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BIRTH PROMOTION MEASURES IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

  • Manuk Movsisyan PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Management at ASUE, Armenia
  • Lusine Karapetyan PhD in Economics, Associate Professor at the Chair of Business Administration, ASUE, Armenia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3894-4803
  • Gor Harutyunyan MA Student at the Chair of Economic Computer Science and Information Systems at ASUE, Armenia
Keywords: fertility rate, birth promotion, socio-demographic policies, maternity leave, financial benefits, services, reproductive behavior

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of birth promotion measures in the RA and European countries. Birth rates throughout the world have dropped dramatically in recent decades. The above-mentioned issue is highlighted in European countries. In 2019 the fertility rate was 1.5 in EU member countries. The same issue exists in Armenia. Since 1990 the birth rates have dropped dramatically in Armenia. Various measures have been carried out and implemented in European countries to promote the birth rate. However, only a few countries have managed to increase the birth rate through state socio-demographic measures and register positive trends. According to the domestic and foreign professional literature, there are two groups of measures of birth promotion (statutory leave and benefits) in the socio-demographic policies of each country. Numerous measures have been developed in Armenia, but by 2014 they had more of a social than demographic component; they did not provide the desired result.

References

Adsera A. (2004), “Changing fertility rates in developed countries. The impact of labor market institutions”, Journal of Population Economics, 17, (1), 17-43.

Andersson G., Duvander A.-Z. (2005), Gender Equality and Fertility in Sweden: A Study on the Impact of the Father's Uptake of Parental Leave on Continued Childbearing, Retrieved from https://www.demogr.mpg.de/Papers/Working/wp-2005-013.pdf

Castles F. G. (2003), “The world turned upside down: below replacement fertility, changing preferences and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries” Journal of European social policy, 13 (3) p. 209-227. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09589287030133001

D'Addio, A., M. d'Ercole. (2005), "Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates: The Role of Policies", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 27, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/880242325663.

Demographic encyclopedia (2013). M.: Encyclopedia. p. 212.

Dmitrievich B. E. (2020), “Maternity, paternity and parental leave in Europe”, Strategic tasks of demographic development: priorities and regional features, p. 506. 7. ILO (2014), “Maternity and paternity at work; Law and practice across the world”. p. 9. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_242615.pdf

Olivetti, Claudia, Petrongolo B. (2017), "The Economic Consequences of Family Policies: Lessons from a Century of Legislation in High-Income Countries." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (1), 205-30. Retrieved from https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.31.1.205

Sherbakov A.I., Mdinaradze M.G., Nazarov A.D., Nazarova E.A. (2017), “Demography study guide”. p. 144-155.

Convetion 183, Revision convetion on the safety of mothernes convention (revised) (1952). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_c183_ru.htm

Euro Stat Statistics Website https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Fertility_statistics

Informationen zum Betreuungsgeld (2013). Retrieved from https://www.elterngeld.net/download/Betreuungsgeld-Flyer.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1OjewBOEtRkcfGSUdX3jNf3DQcF9DUsVcOr5RNl-UfKeOUmTj-BBcAa1s

Khachatryan M. (2019). “Social rights in the Republic of Armenia”. Retrieved from https://www.osf.am/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/%D5%8D%D5%B8%D6%81%D5%AB%D5%A1%D5%AC%D5%A1%D5%AF%D5%A1%D5%B6-%D5%AB%D6%80%D5%A1%D5%BE%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B6%D6%84%D5%B6%D5%A5%D6%80%D5%A8-%D5%80%D5%80-%D5%B8%D6%82%D5%B4.pdf

National project “Demography” (2018). Retrieved from https://mintrud.gov.ru/ministry/programms/demography

RA Labor Code 2004. Retrieved from http://www.irtek.am/views/act.aspx?aid=150003

RA Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.mlsa.am/?p=29966&fbclid=IwAR2S9MdhcMcuE9vyjPJ685IVQdWaX7Lmcd72kbeZ-lb-lqUz5DolGYYamjUc

The World Bank Website Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=EU

Views:

364

Downloads:

241

Published
2021-12-07
Citations
How to Cite
Manuk Movsisyan, Lusine Karapetyan, & Gor Harutyunyan. (2021). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF BIRTH PROMOTION MEASURES IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA AND EUROPEAN COUNTRIES. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, (4(36). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30122021/7713