Keywords: Online services, telecommunication infrastructure, е-government, EGDI, е-participation, digital transformation, digital divide


The basic principles and methodological foundations for measuring the readiness and ability of the national institutions to provide citizens and businesses with access to public services online are considered. On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the study of the implementation of e-government tools in UN member states (UN E-Government Survey), current trends and transformations of the e-government model, the digital divide and digital barriers to further progress in the development of the digital economy and e-democracy are analyzed. The methodological basis of the study applied are techniques and methods of complex comparative analysis and logical generalization and the information base is formed by the results of the UN E-Government Survey and World Bank Governance Surveys.

Author Biography

Antonina Yerina, Professor Taras Shevchenko National University, Department of statistics, information and analytical systems and demography, professor, Kyiv, Ukraine



Mazur, O. (2019). “Current tendencies of implementation of e-government in public administration: foreign experience.” Public Administration Aspects, 7 (12), 147-156.

United Nations Development Programme. Sustainable Development Goals.

UN-iLibrary. United Nations E-Government Survey.

UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2020). E-Government survey 2020. Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development. With addendum on COVID-19 Response.

Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Osman, I., & Hindi, M. (2015).”E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks.” Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 889-915, August

Methodology for UN e-Government Index ranking. eGovSpace.

Riviere, P. (2017). “5 Indices & Frameworks to Evaluate E-participation.” E-Government

Le Blanc, David. (2020). “E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends.” DESA Working Paper No. 163.

Heeks, R. (2006). “Benchmarking e-Government: Improving the National and International measurement, evaluation and comparison of e-Government.” IGovernment Working Paper No.18.

UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Public Institutions. Digital Government.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues”. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3, 220–246.

The World Bank Group. (2014). The Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI).

The World Bank. Digital Government for Development.

OECD. (2016). Digital Government Strategies for Transforming Public Services in the Welfare Areas. OECD comparative study.

Várallyai, L., Herdon, M., & Botos, S. (2015). “Statistical Analyses of Digital Divide Factors.” Procedia Economics and Finance, 19, 364-372.

UN Secretary General (2020). Remarks to Virtual High-Level Meeting on Generation Unlimited: “Connecting Half the World to Opportunities".





How to Cite
Yerina, A., Mazurenko, O., & Demydiuk, O. (2021). BENCHMARKING E-GOVERNMENT: CURRENT TRENDS AND DIGITAL BARRIERS TO DEVELOPMENT. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, (3(35).