A MODEL-THEORETICAL ANALYSIS FOR DIGITAL TAX ADMINISTRATIONS
Abstract
Fairness in the sense of tax equality is a fundamental principle in modern tax systems. In recent years tax administrations have been making tremendous advances in moving from paper tax returns to a far-reaching digitalisation of the taxation procedure. This paper represents the first attempt to examine the impact of digitalisation of the tax administration on fair taxation through model theory. The model suggested in this paper is based on Allingham and Sandmo’s tax evasion model (Allingham & Sandmo, 1972, 323–338) supplemented by psychological costs of tax evasion and compliance costs and then transferred to the context of digitalisation and fair taxation. The model is intended to mathematically derive the influence of various digitalisation measures on the taxpayer's decision to behave fairly. It implies that the objective of fair taxation should be promoted with a mix of deterrent and encouraging measures.
References
Allingham, M.G., & Sandmo, A. (1972), “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323–338.
Bertolino, M. (2017), “Transformative Times,” Tax Insights for business leaders, 17, 10–11.
Borck, R. (2001), “Ökonomische Theorie der Steuerhinterziehung,“ WiSt - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 30(8), 404–408. doi: 10.15358/0340-1650-2001-8-404
Ernst and Young Global (2019). How tax administration is going digital. Retrieved July 1, 2020, from https://www.ey.com/en_gl/tax/how-tax-administration-is-going-digital
Forschungsstelle für empirische Sozialöknomik e.V. (2014). Steuerkultur und Steuermoral in Deutschland 2014. Forschungsbericht über eine empirische Studie im Auftrag des Bund der Steuerzahler Nordrhein-Westfalen e.V. Köln
Gordon, J. P. (1989), “Individual morality and reputation cost as deterrents to tax evasion,” European Economic Review, 33(4), 797–805.
Holmström, B. (1979), “Moral Hazard and Observability,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 74–91.
Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008), “Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework,” Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
Krieger, T. (2020). An Economic Model of Fair Taxation in the Digital Age. In D. Hampel, & H. Vránová (Eds.), PEFnet 2020 European Scientific Conference of Doctoral Students. November 26, 2020. (pp. 93–95). Brno, Czech Republic (online via MS Teams): Faculty of Business and Economics. Mendel University.
McCaffery, E.J., & Slemrod, J.B. (2004). “Toward an Agenda for Behavioral Public Finance”. Retrieved February 23, 2021, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=590201 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.590201
OECD (2019). Tax Administration 2019: Comparative Information on OECD and other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Pauls, A. (2013). Tax Compliance aus Sicht der Agenturtheorie. Dissertation. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena. Jena, Germany.
Sandmo, A. (2005). The Theory of Tax Evasion: A Retrospective View. National Tax Journal, 58(4), 643-663.
Spremann, K. (1989). Agent and Principal. In G. Bamberg, K. Spremann, & W. Ballwieser (Eds.), Agency theory, information, and incentives (pp.3-37). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Stiglitz, J. (2014). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers our Future. In P. Dasgupta, V. Ramanathan; & M. Sánchez Sorondo (Eds.) Sustainable Humanity Sustainable Nature our Responsibility. (pp. 379–399). Joint Workshop on Sustainable Humanity Sustainable Nature our Responsibility. 2-6 May 2014.Vatican City, Vatican: The Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Yaniv, G. (2009), “The Tax Compliance Demand Curve: A Diagrammatical Approach to Income Tax Evasion,” The Journal of Economic Education, 40(2), 213–223.
Yitzhaki, S. (1974), “Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis,” Journal of Public Economics, 3(2), 201–202.
Views:
1099
Downloads:
768
Copyright (c) 2021 Tina Krieger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles are published in open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). Hence, authors retain copyright to the content of the articles.
CC BY 4.0 License allows content to be copied, adapted, displayed, distributed, re-published or otherwise re-used for any purpose including for adaptation and commercial use provided the content is attributed.
