BIOADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN CORRECTION OF PSYCHOEMOTIONAL DISORDERS IN WOMEN WITH INFERTILITY AND ENDURED PRENATAL STRESS

Semenenko I. V.

doi:10.31435/rsglobal_sr/30042021/7536

Semenenko I. V. Запорізький державний медичний університет, Україна https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7431-7818

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_sr/30042021/7536

Keywords: infertility, prenatal stress, psychoemotional disorders, in vitro fertilization, bioadaptive management

Abstract

Treatment of non-motor disorders in patients with infertility and prenatal stress (PS) is an important component of comprehensive treatment of the disease. This study examined the clinical effectiveness of a non-drug method of bioadaptive management - training based on biological feedback (BFB) in the correction of psychoemotional disorders in patients with infertility and prenatal stress. Object and methods of research. The study involved 41 patients with infertility and PS aged 22 to 45 years. Group I consisted of 21 women who underwent infertility treatment using in vitro fertilization and biological feedback, group II - 20 women who underwent treatment using in vitro fertilization without biological feedback. All patients were assessed for psychoemotional status on the Beck Depression Scale (BDI-II), tests for Spielberger-Khanin reactive anxiety, assessment of personal anxiety on the 1st day of observation, at the end of the course of BFB - training in group I and after 10±2 days in the comparison group. Results. There was a significant overall improvement in the psycho-emotional state of patients who underwent a full course of BFB - training at the end of therapy (p<0,05). There was a statistically significant difference between the level of certain psychoemotional disorders (in particular, anxiety, reduced stress resistance) of the studied groups (p<0,05). However, in contrast to group I patients who underwent BOS training, no statistically significant improvement in the psychoemotional status of group II patients during the observation period was found. Conclusions. BFB training can be considered as an appropriate component in the comprehensive treatment of psychoemotional disorders in patients with infertility and prenatal stress.

References

Авраменко Н. В. Современные методы диагностики в репродуктологии. Запорожский медицинский журнал. 2014. № 5 (86). С. 89-96.

Гавриленко В. Ю. Соціально-психологічні та моральноетичні аспекти проблеми бездітності. Психологічні науки. 2014. № 121. С. 73-77.

Глуховец Б. И., Глуховец Н. Г., Новикова Е. И. Искусственное бесплодие современных женщин (медицинские и социальные аспекты). Мать и дитя: матер. Х регионального научн. форума. 2017. С. 224-225.

Алгоритми преконцепційного і пренатального моніторингу в родинах з порушеннями репродуктивної функції / Грабар В. В. та ін. Вісник проблем біології і медицини. 2015. № 1 (117). С. 121-126.

Таблиці народжуваності, смертності та середньої очікуваної тривалості життя: статистичний бюлетень / Державний комітет статистики. 2017. Retrieved from http://database.ukrcensus.gov.ua/PXWEB2007/ukr/publ_new1/2017/BL1001_2017_02_born.pdf (дата звертання: 05.03.2021)

Banerjee, S., and Argáez, C. (2017), Neurofeedback and biofeedback for mood and anxiety disorders: A review of clinical effectiveness and guidelines. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, pp. 1-26. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK531603/

Duarte-Moreira, R., Castro, K., Luz-Santos, C., Martins, J., Sá, K., and Baptista, A. (2018), Electromyographic biofeedback in motor function recovery after peripheral nerve injury: An integrative review of the literature. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 43(4), 247-257.

Goessl, V., Curtiss, J., and Hofmann, S. (2017), The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback training on stress and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 47(15), 2578-286.

Grebysheva, T. S., Brazovskaia, N. G., Zhukova, I. A., Nikitina, M. A., Izhboldina, O. P., Zhukova, N. G., Alifirova, V. M., and Pekker, Ya. S. (2014), Primenenie bioupravleniia v reabilitatsii patsientov s bolezniu Parkinsona [The application of biomongineering in rehabilitation of patients with Parkinson's disease]. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine, 13(4), 38-42. [in Russiаn].

Kondo, K., Noonan, K., Freeman, M., Ayers, C., Morasco, B., and Kansagara, D. (2019), Efficacy of biofeedback for medical conditions: An evidence map. Journal of general internal medicine, 34(12), 2883–2893. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05215-z

Kropp, P., Meyer, B., Meyer, W., and Dresler, T. (2017), An update on behavioral treatments in migraine – current knowledge and future options. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 17(11), 1059-1068.

McAusland, L., and Addington, J. (2016), Biofeedback to treat anxiety in young people at clinical high risk for developing psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 12(4), 694-701.

Sielski, R., Rief, W., and Glombiewski, J. (2016), Efficacy of biofeedback in chronic back pain: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 25-41.

Simón, M., Bueno, A., Otero, P., Vázquez, F., and Blanco, V. (2019), A randomized controlled trial on the effects of electromyographic biofeedback on quality of life and bowel symptoms in elderly women with dyssynergic defecation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(18), 3247.

Skorvanek, M., Martinez-Martin, P., Kovacs, N., Rodriguez-Violante, M., Corvol, J., Taba, P., Seppi, K., Levin, O., et al. (2017), Differences in MDS-UPDRS Scores Based on Hoehn and Yahr Stage and Disease Duration. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 4(4), 536-544.

Steer, R., Ball, R., Ranieri, W., and Beck, A. (1997), Further evidence for the construct validity of the beck depression inventory-II with psychiatric outpatients. Psychological Reports, 80(2), 443-446.