SOLUTION OF A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION- MAKING PROBLEM ON BASE OF PROMETHEE METHOD

  • Salimov Vagif Hasan Oglu Ph.D., Azerbaijan Republic, Baku, Azerbaijan state oil and industry university, assoc. prof. of "Computer engineering" department
Keywords: Multi criteria decision making, aggregation, preference, difference, indifference, rank

Abstract

Multi criteria decision making problem was considered. Review of existing multi criteria decision making methods was presented. Methods of solving this problem can be divided into two large groups: methods using the aggregation of all alternatives according to all criteria and the solution of the obtained one-criterion problem, the second group is associated with the procedure of pairwise comparisons. Promethee method have been considered with details. This method is based on the pairwise comparison of alternatives and specific aggregation procedures. The preference function are considered for minimization and maximization cases. As practice problem the job selection is considered. Three important criteria are used: salary, time, risk. The results of all computations are presented.

References

C.-L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer- Verlag, 1981

V. Belton and T. Stewart, Multiple criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. Springer Science & Business Media, 2002.

A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, Khalil MD Nor, Z. Khalifah, N. Zakwan, A. Valipour Multiple criteria decision- making techniques and their applications - a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014, ISSN: 1331-677X (Print), 2015

Chakraborty, S., & Zavadskas, EK Applications of WASPAS method in manufacturing decision making. Informatica, 25 (1), 1-20, 2014

Boucher, TO, & MacStravic, E. L. Multi attribute evaluation within a present value framework and its relation to the analytic hierarchy process. The Engineering Economist, 37 (1), 1-32, 1991

Taha, RA, & Daim, T. Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis, a literature review. In Research and Technology Management in the Electricity Industry (pp. 17-30). Springer London, 2013

Wu, HY, Chen, JK, Chen, IS, & Zhuo, HH Ranking universities based on performance evaluation by a hybrid MCDM model. Measurement, 45 (5), 856-880., 2012

Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Ardente, D. Decision making in energy planning: the ELECTRE multicriteria analysis approach compared to a fuzzy-sets methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 39 (16-18), 1869-1881, 1998

Rogers, M., & Bruen, M. Using ELECTRE III to choose route for Dublin port motorway. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (4), 313-323, 2002

Srdjevic, B., & Medeiros, YDP Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resources Management, 22 (7), 877-894, 2008

Meixner, O. Fuzzy AHP group decision analysis and its application for the evaluation of energy sources. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy / Network Process, Pittsburgh, PA, USA (Vol. 29), 2009

Phanarut Srichetta and Wannasiri Thurachon. Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate and select product of notebook computers. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 168-173, 2012. DOI: 10.7763/IJMO.2012.V2.105.

Ayhan, MB A fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection problem: A case study in a Gear motor company. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1311.2886, 2013

Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A.A., Ghorbani, M.A., & Shahbazi, F. Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma, 310:178-190, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.012.

Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (8), 11363-11368, 2009

Nydic k, RL, & Hill, RP Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 28 (2), 31-36, 1992

Mary, SASA and Suganya, G. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using ELECTRE. Ci rcuits and Systems, 7,1008-1020, 2016

Mare schal, B., & Mertens, D. BANKS a multicriteria, PROMETHEE-based, decision support system for the evaluation of the international banking sector. Journal of Decision Systems, 1 (2-3), 175-189, 1992

Abu- Taleb, MF, & Mareschal, B. Water resources planning in the Middle East: application of the PROMETHEE V multicriteria method. European journal of operational research, 81 (3), 500-511, 1995

Goumas, M., & Lygerou, V. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123 (3), 606-613, 2000

Dağdeviren, M. Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 19 (4), 397-406, 2008

Brans, JP, & Vincke, P. Note— A Preference Ranking Organization Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management science, 31 (6), 647-656, 1985

Views:

294

Downloads:

229

Published
2020-08-31
Citations
How to Cite
Salimov Vagif Hasan Oglu. (2020). SOLUTION OF A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION- MAKING PROBLEM ON BASE OF PROMETHEE METHOD. International Academy Journal Web of Scholar, (7(49). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_wos/30092020/7182